It was bad. the Japanese wanted to attack american fleets.
Answer: D) government should have a limited role in the economy
Explanation: The whole idea of laissez-faire economics is that the government should stay away (hands off!) from the economy. The first two are obviously eliminated, and the third one has nothing to do with economics, so that one is eliminated as well.
The correct answer is Martin Luther King JR.
Martin Luther King JR advocated for non-violent resistance to Jim Crow laws and believed that the Civil Rights movement could only be successful if it was nonviolent.
The others on the list disagreed.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The benefits of USA in the experience of having minerals:
-Minerals allow for the economic exploitation of raw materials.
-It is a good source of income for this industry.
-Minerals can be exported and are highly demanded by other nations.
-The exploitation of minerals has created thousands of jobs in the country.
The disadvantages of having minerals:
-Mining damages the land. Dynamite explosions are needed to dig in the dirt.
-This industry damages the ecology of the place. It is not good for the environment and the wildlife.
-Mining towns that once were very productive end up being ghost towns.
Correct answer: C) seclusionist
Details:
Writing for <em>Ranker, </em>Danielle Ownbey notes: "The Amish live a secluded life away from other Americans (known to them as the English). Because of this seclusion, the average person knows very few facts about the inner workings of the Amish religion and culture."
Your question mentioned the role of the Supreme Court in protecting the rights of the Amish to follow their own beliefs and practices. An example would be the case, <em>Wisconsin v. Jonas Yoder </em>(1972), in which the decision of the Supreme Court was that a state could not compel education past 8th grade for Amish children. The case revolved around some Amish families who would not send their children to New Glarus High School in Wisconsin. County court held the parents responsible (represented by Jonas Yoder, one of the Amish fathers). However, the Wisconsin Supreme Court and then the US Supreme Court found in favor of Yoder and the Amish families. The parents' right to freedom of religion was seen as a stronger concern than the state's interest in educating children. An interesting fact about the <em>Wisconsin v. Yoder </em>case is that the Amish typically would not go to court to settle a dispute, because that would be a move beyond what their religious beliefs would allow. But a Lutheran minister named William Lindholm took up their cause for the sake of protecting religious freedom as a primary right. Lindholm established the National Committee for Amish Religious Freedom.
