1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Cloud [144]
3 years ago
6

In the Supreme Court case Korematsu v. United States, the government said that the Fourteenth Amendment

History
2 answers:
allochka39001 [22]3 years ago
6 0
The government ruled that in a time of emergency, such as war, the amendment could be waived!!
Yuliya22 [10]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

It was a matter of national security, pure emergency in a time of war. In February 1942, President Franklin D. Roosevelt approved an executive order whereby the Army could evict anyone considered a risk from their homes and detain them in concentration camps. Little more than two months had passed since Japan's attack at the Pearl Harbor base in Hawaii, and Washington wanted to prevent espionage or sabotage in military sensitive areas at all costs. The measure resulted in the expulsion from the west coast of the United States of those citizens of Japanese origin, including those with US nationality. More than 100,000 ended up in a detention center in the interior of the country. One of those expelled, Fred Korematsu, protested and was convicted of disobeying the military order. The case reached the Supreme Court, which in 1944 ruled in favor of this policy in the name of defense and protection at an exceptional time, establishing that citizenship, protected by the Fourteenth Amendment, cedes their rights against common national security to all the inhabitants of the country.

You might be interested in
(5-7 sentences for each question)
miv72 [106K]

Answer:

1. With his conquest of England in 1066, William I secured for himself and his immediate successors a position of unprecedented power. He was able to dominate not only the country but also the barons who had helped him win it and the ecclesiastics who served the English church. He forced Pope Alexander II to be content with indirect control over the church in a land that the papacy hitherto had regarded as bound by the closest ties to Rome. William’s son Henry I—whose accession (1100) was challenged by his eldest brother, Robert, duke of Normandy—was compelled to make concessions to the nobles and clergy in the Charter of Liberties, a royal edict issued upon his coronation. His successor, Stephen (1135), whose hold on the throne was threatened by Henry I’s daughter Matilda, again issued a solemn charter (1136) with even more generous promises of good government in church and state. Matilda’s son Henry II also began his reign (1154) by issuing a solemn charter promising to restore and confirm the liberties and free customs that King Henry, his grandfather, had granted “to God and holy church and all his earls, barons and all his men.” There developed, in fact, through the 12th century a continuous tradition that the king’s coronation oath should be strengthened by written promises stamped with the king’s seal.

2.

 Rome needed money to run.  

The Republic needed money to pay the legions, to build roads, sewers, aqueducts, and arenas, and to pay for the welfare programs that fed the poor.  To get this money Rome created a system called tax farmers.

A tax farmer was a person who bought the right from the Senate to tax all the people and business in a certain area.  The biggest problem with this system is that the senate didn't set up any controls on the tax farmers.  They didn't say how much taxes were, or who got taxed.  They left all that up to the tax farmer.

Tax farming was a business, and the tax farmers were in it to make a profit.  While most Romans were willing to pay taxes, and even allow the tax farmer some profit, many of the tax farmers went way beyond what people expected.  Many of them saw this as a way to get rich.  Plus, since the tax farmer decided who got taxed and who didn't, you could bribe the tax farmer to make your taxes low or maybe tax your competitors out of business, or if you had enough bribe money, maybe both.  If a Roman citizen didn't pay their taxes at whatever amount the tax farmer set, you and your entire family could be sold into slavery.

Even with the tax farmer system, the Roman government wasn't getting enough money and Rome was going broke.

2.  Elected officials were corrupt.  

Under Roman law you could pay someone to vote for you.  So rich people could actually buy their way into the senate.  Once in the Senate, there were many ways to get huge amounts of money.  Remember the tax farmer?  Since they bought the position from the Senate, the Senate set the amount it cost and decided who actually got the job.  Plus the Senate decided who got to build the roads, arenas etc.  So construction companies bribed the Senate to get the construction contracts.  Finally since the Senate made all the laws, people could bribe senators to make laws that they wanted.  The Government of the Republic was rife with corruption and graft.

3.  Rome was riddled with crime.  Criminals ran wild in Rome.  Since there was no police force, there was no one to stop them.  It was not safe to walk the streets without a guard.  Wealthy Romans hired guards and even built their own small armies to protect their homes and families.  This led to further problems when the guards of one wealthy family fought the guards of another family over insults or business territories.  The Senate couldn't do anything since there was no money to hire police or even create a militia.

There were other problems in Rome to add to these.  Senators didn't trust each other, and they really didn't trust the legions.  They even passed laws making it illegal for a legion to enter Rome.  Rome was a disaster.  The people of Rome were tired of the mess and wanted the problems solved and the corruption ended.  Julius Caesar told the people of Rome that he could solve all of Rome's problems.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was one effect of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff?
vladimir1956 [14]

Other countries responded by raising tariffs on American goods, further hurting the economy was one effect of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff

Option  C

<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>

Smooth - Hawley Tarriff is also known as US Tarriff act 1930. This act was signed into law during the presidency of Herbert Hoover in the late 1929, which was around the start of the Great depression. This Tarriff was meant to raise the Tarriff (taxes) on the imported goods. The actual intention behind bringing this Smooth - Hawley Tarriff is to protect their own manufacturers and their own companies from the alien companies of US.

But they raised the taxes too high such that no one was able to afford it is except the wealthier ones. And this ignited the other countries and they too imposed too much tax on American goods. Since this happened during th great depression, this act worsened the whole economic status of US.

6 0
3 years ago
Olson discusses the development of the theological interpretation of God as Trinity. Where did Christian theological interpretat
Ronch [10]

Answer:

By the time of Aquinas  in Italy in the thirteenth century in reply to Nominalism.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What did Lee hope to accomplish by moving Jackson into the Shenandoah Valley?
9966 [12]
A counter attack against the onslaught of Union troops.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The states are prohibited by the united states constitution from taxing which of these?
svp [43]
There are no states that are prohibited from taxing by the U. S. Constitution. Such a prohibition may or may not be placed in the State's Constitution or Charter or such.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which event occurred FIRST in World War II?
    9·1 answer
  • Choose two answers.
    6·2 answers
  • Which answer best describes the South in the early 1800s?
    13·2 answers
  • 4. What did events like the Walking Purchase prove about treaties between Europeans and Native Americans?
    5·2 answers
  • Explanation? Why was there conflict between Piedmont and Tidewater residents? How did events here foreshadow the eventual fight
    5·1 answer
  • What groups of people was feudalism good for in china
    13·2 answers
  • What Was Ancient Civilization in Egypt Like?:Question 1
    11·1 answer
  • Tiradentes means " tooth-puller"
    12·1 answer
  • The admiral recalls the smallest boat crew, the 'munchkin boat,' was the most successful during
    14·1 answer
  • What dose all of these regions share <br> the rocky Mountains, the northwest, and southeast Idaho
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!