Sure! I'll try!
2x + 29 +11 = x + 28
First, you would put like terms ( the x ) on the same side.
2x + 29 + 11 = x + 28
-2x -2x
Giving you: 29 + 11 = -3x + 28
Then, you would add 29 and 11 together to get 40.
Next, you'd put the 28 on the other side.
40 = -3x + 28
-28 - 28
Giving you: 12 = -3x
A pentagon has 5 sides.
Hope this helped :)
Answer: Ground Speed = 91 km/hr, Bearing = 189°
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
Step 1: Draw a picture (see attached) to determine the angle between the given vectors. Notice that I moved the wind vector 180° <em>so the head of the wind vector would line up with the tail of the plane vector. </em>This created an angle of 34° between the plane and wind vectors. <em>Why?</em>
- the dashed line is 45°
- 79° (plane) - 45° (wind) = 34°
Step 2: Solve for the length of the resultant vector using Law of Cosines
<em>c² = a² + b² - ab cos C</em>
c² = (111)² + (25)² - (111)(25) cos 34°
c² = 12,946 - 4601
c² = 8345
c = 91
Ground speed is 91 km/hr
Step 3: Solve for the bearing of the resultant vector using Law of Sines
A = 9°
<em>Reminder that we moved the wind vector 180° to create the resultant vector so we need to add 180° to our answer.</em>
Bearing = A + 180°
= 9° + 180°
= 189°
15-8=7
that would be the equation and there would be $7 left
Answer:
The complete question is:
At a university, 13% of students smoke.
a) Calculate the expected number of smokers in a random sample of 100 students from this university:
b) The university gym opens at 9 am on Saturday mornings. One Saturday morning at 8:55 am there are 27 students outside the gym waiting for it to open. Should you use the same approach from part (a) to calculate the expected number of smokers among these 27 students?
Part a is easy, because is a random sample, we can expect that just 13% of these 100 students to be smokers, and 13% of 100 is 13, so we can expect 13 of those 100 students to be smokers.
b) This time we do not have a random sample, our sample is a sample of 15 students who go to the gym in the early morning, so our sample is biased. (And we do not know if this bias is related to smoking or not, and how that relationship is), so we can't use the same approach that we used in the previous part.
