According to the study of the anthropologist David, it can be inferred that US military bases and military actions are ineffective ways of solving international problems (option A)
Since its formation, the United States has been a very influential country worldwide. Today it is one of the world's economic powers and its influence on other countries transcends all kinds of issues.
After World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union shared the label of being world powers. This unleashed competition in all aspects to prevail globally over its rival. Due to the above, the US intervention in other countries intensified as in the case of:
- Vietnam
- South Korea
- Europe
- South America
- Middle East
These interventions have been aimed at solving different problems in the countries. However, the result has been adverse because this only intensifies the problem of violence, violating the self-determination of the people.
According to the above, the most correct conclusion reached by the anthropologist David is that the intervention of the United States has not contributed significantly to the improvement of the problems in other countries.
Note: This question is incomplete because the options are missing. Here are the options:
- A. U.S. military bases and military actions are ineffective ways of solving international problems.
- B. U.S. military bases are effective in benefiting indigenous peoples.
- C. U.S. military bases are effective in benefiting U.S. citizens.
- D. U.S. military bases create more jobs for U.S. citizens than would funding education and health-care industries within the United States.
Learn more about anthropology in: brainly.com/question/8116175
American Indians are the most impoverished racial group in the country. Not surprisingly, if you compare Indian communities to other impoverished areas in the United States, you’ll see similarities in terms of single motherhood, teen pregnancy, drug use, and violence.
Most illegal immigrants come from D. Mexico. Hope this helped!
Answer:
Answer is He cannot get from the mediator copies of documents or accounts of what was said because of the confidential nature of mediation proceedings.
Refer below.
Explanation:
Sexual Harassment ADR. Jenny is very angry with her supervisor, Sleaze, at the Mexican fast-food restaurant at which she works which is owned by an international company located in Mexico. He has been making inappropriate sexual comments to her and other employees. Jenny decides to sue and retains a lawyer, Brice. Brice talks with the owners of the restaurant and is informed that Jenny signed an agreement to arbitrate any claims. Brice tells Jenny that it is completely up to her and that if she wishes, she can disregard the arbitration agreement and proceed to court. Jenny informed Brice about other employees who had complained about sexual harassment and entered into mediation agreements. Brice promises her that he will get copies of all documents and everything that was taken down by the court reporter at those mediations. He also tells Jenny in response to her question about the possibility of mediation in her case to forget it because mediation is pretty much the same thing as arbitration. Brice obtain information from the previous mediators regarding what occurred at the previous mediations:
He cannot get from the mediator copies of documents or accounts of what was said because of the confidential nature of mediation proceedings.
That totally is correct communication is the key to every thing