This question includes some misspelled words; here is the correct question:
Which point of view is most likely to be unreliable in a story?
All points of view in a story are equally reliable.
The first person narrator is most likely to be unreliable.
All points of view in a story are equally unreliable.
The third-person point of view is most likely to be unreliable.
The correct answer is The first-person narrator is most likely to be unreliable.
Explanation:
In a narrative text, an unreliable narrator implies the narrator lies on purpose to the reader, or his/her version of the story is not completely accurate. This feature of narration occurs mainly if the story, novel, etc. includes a first-person narrator. This is because in a first-person narrator, the thoughts, feelings, and point of view of one of the characters prevail, and this causes the events told are subjective and therefore more likely to be inaccurate. Also, this does not occur if there is a third-person narrator because in this case the narrator acts as an observer and this makes it more objective.
8 hundred thousands and 1 thousand.
Answer:
Look Below
Step-by-step explanation:
1. A person would have to work 9 Hours to get 63$ for 7$ per hour.
2. Reese is 16 years old because if you do 34 - 18 = 16. Or you could do 16 + 18 = 34 to confirm it.
3. 10 - 4 = 6 Sean is 6 feet tall total because if you do a subtraction problem with the two variables you get 6.
4. I am not able to see the numbers on the right unfortunately so all you have to do for this one is to minus how much her brother has by 8 to get her amount.
Hope This Helps! Have A Good Day! Good Luck With Your Work!
Answer:
1.1352 L
Step-by-step explanation:
L = qt 1.0567
qt = 0.946 L
1:4 = 5
0.946/5 = 0.1892 L one part
0.1892 x 11 = 2.0812 11 parts as 1+10 =11
Answer therefore is subtracting 5 from 11 parts to get the final 6 parts added = 2.0812 - 0.946
= 1.1352 L
Salut!
Avem 302340 kg + 240003 kg = 542343 kg fan;
Atunci, vom avea 302340 kg + 542343 kg = 844683 kg de nutret;
Bafta!
