Answer:
h > 5
h < 0
Step-by-step explanation:
We suppose that a "Special Solution" inequality is one that is technically incorrect, but is written using a compact "shorthand" form.
As written, the inequality claims that 17 < 2, which is false. There can be no value of the variable that will make this true. We presume the intended meaning is ...
17 < 3h +2 <u>or</u> 3h +2 < 2
<h3>Special solution</h3>
Subtracting 2 from the inequality gives ...
15 < 3h < 0
Dividing by 3 gives ...
5 < h < 0
There is no value of h that is both greater than 5 and less than 0, so we presume this means the OR (union) of the solution sets ...
h > 5
h < 0
First to do this you need to locate the hundredth place which is the second 2. So then use the 5 or higher rule, which is if the number is higher than 5 round up or if it's lower then 5 round down. So 2 is lower than 5 so you would round down giving you the answer of...
0.230 <span />
Answer:
Options a, b, c are correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
First let's see the equation that governs the statement, which is the following:
![r = \frac{cov (x, y)}{\sqrt{var(x) var (y)} }](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=r%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bcov%20%28x%2C%20y%29%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7Bvar%28x%29%20var%20%28y%29%7D%20%7D)
Therefore, reading options a, b, c are correct.
Since from the formula we have the correlation coefficient of two variables x and y and here it shows us the correlation between x, y and y, x is the same.
This means that the 0.4 correlation implies a moderate but positive relationship between the two variables.
that is, the highest or lowest value of one variable implies a highest or lowest value of the other variable, respectively.
Answer:
i think it is the edge
Step-by-step explanation: