Answer:
Locke was a “reluctant” democrat because he favored a representative government, while Rousseau an “extreme” democrat because he believed everyone should vote. Rousseau argued that the general will of the people could not be decided by elected representatives. He believed in a direct democracy in which everyone voted to express the general will and to make the laws of the land. Rousseau had in mind a democracy on a small scale, a city-state like his native Geneva. John Locke refuted the theory of the divine right of kings and argued that all persons are endowed with natural rights to life, liberty, and property and that rulers who fail to protect those rights may be removed by the people, by force if necessary.
Explanation:
https://toistudent.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/news/culture/why-was-genghis-khan-feared/11255.html theres a good article on your question
Jumonville's murder in captivity incited a strong French response, and Washington was unable to defend his makeshift Fort Necessity from French forces led by Jumonville's half-brother. Washington surrendered on July 4 and signed a confession—in French, which he could not read—to Jumonville's assassination.
Colbert believed that in trying to prevent wealth from leaving the country, he tried to make France self-sufficient
