Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Step one:
given data
Maya
P=$1650
r=5%= 0.05
t= 4 years
The simple interest expression is
A=P(1+rt)
A=1650(1+0.08*4)
A=1650(1+0.32)
A=1650(1.32)
A=1650*1.32
A=$2178
James
P=$1600
r=8%= 0.08
t=4years
The compound interest expression is
A=P(1+r)^t
A=1600(1+0.08)^4
A=1600(1.08)^4
A=1600*1.360
A=$2176
<em>After 4 years Mayas' balance is $2178</em>
<em>After 4 years James' balance is $2176</em>
<em>the difference is =2178-2176=$2</em>
2*1*1= 2 m^3 per chest
2 m^3 per chest* 18 chests= 36 m^3 total
Final answer: 36 m^3
Answer:
390=W 195=L Area=76050
Step-by-step explanation:
You have two lengths and one width for your perimeter
P= 2L + W
you are given your perimiter 780
780= 2L + W
To solve for your maximum Width
780-2L=w
Area is L * W
A= (780-2L)*L
A= 780L - 2L^2
the derivitive of the Area
A' = 780-4L =0
add 4L to both sides
780=4L
divide by 4 on both sides
195=L
Bring back 780-2L=W and plug in what you now know is L
780-2(195)=W
780-390=W
390=W
The answer is -x^2 -4 because f(x) is x^2 so -x^2 would be the opposite going downwards. And the graph is on the -4 spot so it’s -4
Step-by-step explanation:
the option with the isoceles triangles can NOT be just of that proof, because nowhere is it defined or proven that there is or are isoceles triangles involved. even though the picture looks like it, but that does not mean anything for the formal proof.
actually, this proof is the same (and is also valid) for non-isoceles triangles.
