<span>Overgeneralized beliefs about a group of people that often underline prejudicial emotions are called "stereotypes".
A stereotype refers to a settled, over summed up conviction about a specific gathering or class of individuals.
One advantage of a stereotype is that it empowers us to react quickly to circumstances since we may have had a comparative ordeal previously. One disadvantage is that it influences us to overlook contrasts between people; consequently we ponder individuals that won't not be valid.</span>
Answer: Non Marxist
Explanation:
Non Marxist people are those who do not follow the ideology of Marxist.They tend to believe that conflicts are not caused due to inequality rather due to completing values .Thus, if people will understand the values of others as well then conflicts can be reduced.
Non-Marxist try to follow the pattern of acknowledging others views and interest so that settlement can be made in any situation.This will provide a win-win outcome for all the involved parties and dispute will not occur.
Native Americans in the United States fall into a number of distinct ethno-linguistic and territorial phyla, whose only uniting characeristic is that they were in a stage of either Mesolithic (hunter-gatherer) or Neolithic (subsistence farming) culture at the time of European contact.
They can be classified as belonging to a number of large cultural areas:
<span>Continental US</span>
The entire situation with the colonies revolting from British control wouldn't have happened without the Seven Years War (of which the section happening in the North American colonies is called the "French and Indian War").
The British only raised taxes, which is the thing that first upset the American Colonies, to pay down the debt from fighting that war.
The British wouldn't have been considering allowing the Catholic settlers from Canada to move into the Ohio Valley and to keep those from the American Colonies out if they hadn't won the war, since Canada would still have been French.
The American colonists would have had less grievances with the British for the way that the leadership of the British armies messed up in the Colonies if the war hadn't happened.
The American colonists wouldn't have had as many experienced combatants and leaders (Washington being a huge one that learned his skill in war fighting for the British) without the earlier war taking place.
Answer: The Viet Minh, in full Viet Nam Doc Lap Dong Minh Hoi. An English League for the Independence of Vietnam, organization that led the struggle for Vietnamese independence from French rule. They I guess you could say wanted to take over the land that French has, they needed new territories in order to keep their trade orders going. But in time war began, and then the British went for the french to so there was just this big fight between them all.
Sorry if this really didn't help, I tried. Im working on history rn, so I just went through my lessons and got the info that I could gather from there and right off the top of my head.
