1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ZanzabumX [31]
3 years ago
9

Why did Germany pass the Nuremberg Laws under Adolf Hilters leadership

History
1 answer:
jeyben [28]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Two distinct laws passed in Nazi Germany in September 1935 are known collectively as the Nuremberg Laws: the Reich Citizenship Law and the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor. These laws embodied many of the racial theories underpinning Nazi ideology. They would provide the legal framework for the systematic persecution of Jews in Germany.

Adolf Hitler announced the Nuremberg Laws on September 15, 1935. Germany’s parliament (the Reichstag), then made up entirely of Nazi representatives, passed the laws. Antisemitism was of central importance to the Nazi Party, so Hitler had called parliament into a special session at the annual Nazi Party rally in Nuremberg, Germany. The Nazis had long sought a legal definition that identified Jews not by religious affiliation but according to racial antisemitism. Jews in Germany were not easy to identify by sight. Many had given up traditional practices and appearances and had integrated into the mainstream of society. Some no longer practiced Judaism and had even begun celebrating Christian holidays, especially Christmas, with their non-Jewish neighbors. Many more had married Christians or converted to Christianity.

According to the Reich Citizenship Law and many ancillary decrees on its implementation, only people of “German or kindred blood” could be citizens of Germany. A supplementary decree published on November 14, the day the law went into force, defined who was and was not a Jew. The Nazis rejected the traditional view of Jews as members of a religious or cultural community. They claimed instead that Jews were a race defined by birth and by blood.

Despite the persistent claims of Nazi ideology, there was no scientifically valid basis to define Jews as a race. Nazi legislators looked therefore to family genealogy to define race. People with three or more grandparents born into the Jewish religious community were Jews by law. Grandparents born into a Jewish religious community were considered “racially” Jewish. Their “racial” status passed to their children and grandchildren. Under the law, Jews in Germany were not citizens but “subjects" of the state.

This legal definition of a Jew in Germany covered tens of thousands of people who did not think of themselves as Jews or who had neither religious nor cultural ties to the Jewish community. For example, it defined people who had converted to Christianity from Judaism as Jews. It also defined as Jews people born to parents or grandparents who had converted to Christianity. The law stripped them all of their German citizenship and deprived them of basic rights.

To further complicate the definitions, there were also people living in Germany who were defined under the Nuremberg Laws as neither German nor Jew, that is, people having only one or two grandparents born into the Jewish religious community. These “mixed-raced” individuals were known as Mischlinge. They enjoyed the same rights as “racial” Germans, but these rights were continuously curtailed through subsequent legislation.

You might be interested in
In one or two sentences, explain the basis of the on-going discussion about Confederate monuments.
S_A_V [24]

The discussion about the confederate monuments is based on how these monuments still try to show white supremacy.

The monuments are seen as symbols of racism and it has sparked an outrage on people from other races who feel that the monuments should not exist.

<h3>Who were the confederates?</h3>

The monuments of the confederates has been sparking these responses due to the fact that most of the people were those that owned slaves in the South.

The confederates were slave owners and they discriminated a lot on the black people in the country when they were alive.

Read more on the confederates here:

brainly.com/question/2720323

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following individuals would likely have had the best least power in the Medievil hierarchy
ivanzaharov [21]

Can you put the options?

8 0
3 years ago
The following question refers to a hypothetical situation.
Anna35 [415]

Answer:

The board of supervisors is that the legislative and executive body of the county government. The supervisors pass all ordinances governing the county and are liable for seeing that functions delegated to the county are properly discharged. The role of elected officials is that of governance. they create collective decisions. supported the requirements and desires of the community. role is that the management and implementation of the council or board policies.

Explanation:

I took the test and got it right.

5 0
3 years ago
What is the key to help individual citizens cultivate a relationship with their governments at all levels?
Temka [501]
Communication would be the main aspect of anything when getting right with somebody or even something such as a pet because i know u talk to yours<span />
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which Communist policies are characteristic of totalitarian rule? Check all that apply.
Sveta_85 [38]

The correct answers are B, C, and F.

B) Censoring books and newspapers: Both forms of government control apply strict censorship as individuals cannot claim any freedom of speech, thought and writing. The officials restrict or shut down completely any form of press, publication of books, radio, and/or television that's not under the regime's control.

C) Creating a powerful secret police force: In order to maintain control of the population, this type of government entities look to <em>keep people constantly afraid</em>, and one of the tools they use is terror. Whether its using a secret police that acts as vehicle of oppression, or also using other kind of armed forces that serve the purpose of creating a sense of constant threat.  

F) Forbidding the practice of organized religion: Communism and Totalitarianism conceive themselves as a <em>potential replacement for the entities of faith</em> that a free country may decide to praise as another tool to ensure their grasp on power. Keep in mind that while totalitarianism is driven to establish itself as a new religion, Communism sees it more as an instrument of domination of the masses.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Travel in the early 1800s was much the same as it had been during colonial times.
    7·1 answer
  • help fast Ghana grew powerful because it a. owned many gold mines. b. was located on the Mediterranean. c. taxed traders and had
    14·1 answer
  • Who is called "the father of history?"
    8·2 answers
  • How did European colonization affect American Indians
    6·2 answers
  • What challenges faced the leaders of the Union?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a government process? A. a police officer arresting a shoplifter B. getting a fine from the Enviro
    9·2 answers
  • What was Vladimir, Grand Prince of Kiev, known for? A. After sending out men to investigate various religions, he chose Eastern
    13·2 answers
  • Which statement about the US Mexican War is true? a. Some Texans saw the war as a chance for revenge b. Texan women played an in
    7·1 answer
  • What was the largest outcome of the Embargo Act of 1807? <br>​
    15·1 answer
  • What was sparta ? what was like for them ?​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!