1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fiasKO [112]
2 years ago
12

Ok so i need help with this the image is below

Mathematics
2 answers:
mihalych1998 [28]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The graph

Step-by-step explanation:

ELEN [110]2 years ago
4 0

Answer: the line shown in the graph is different

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
It's really hard for me to understand what they are asking.​
Gekata [30.6K]

Answer:

B is the correct answer

Step-by-step explanation:

Angles 1, 2, and 3 added together should make 180 degrees.

So, if angle 2 is 70 degrees, you subtract 70 from 180 (180-70=110) and you're left with 110 degrees.

Angle 1 and 3 add together should make 110 degrees which makes B the only true statement.

3 0
2 years ago
A restaurant chain has two locations in a medium-sized town and, believing that it has oversaturated the market for its food, is
scoray [572]

Answer:

Yes, since the test statistic value is greater than the critical value.

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

\bar X_{1}=360000 represent the mean for the downtown restaurant

\bar X_{2}=340000 represent the mean for the freeway restaurant

s_{1}=50000 represent the sample standard deviation for downtown

s_{2}=40000 represent the sample standard deviation for the freeway

n_{1}=36 sample size for the downtown restaurant

n_{2}=36 sample size for the freeway restaurant

t would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

\alpha=0.05 significance level provided

Develop the null and alternative hypotheses for this study?

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the true mean of revenue for downtown is higher than for freeway restaurant, the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis:\mu_{1}\leq \mu_{2}

Alternative hypothesis:\mu_{1} > \mu_{2}

Since we don't know the population deviations for each group, for this case is better apply a t test to compare means, and the statistic is given by:

t=\frac{\bar X_{1}-\bar X_{2}}{\sqrt{\frac{s^2_{1}}{n_{1}}+\frac{s^2_{2}}{n_{2}}}} (1)

t-test: Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine whether the means of two groups are equal to each other.

Determine the critical value.

Based on the significance level\alpha=0.05 and \alpha/2=0.025 we can find the critical values from the t distribution dith degrees of freedom df=36+36-2=55+88-2=70, we are looking for values that accumulates 0.025 of the area on the right tail on the t distribution.

For this case the value is t_{1-\alpha/2}=1.66

Calculate the value of the test statistic for this hypothesis testing.

Since we have all the values we can replace in formula (1) like this:

t=\frac{360000-340000}{\sqrt{\frac{50000^2}{36}+\frac{40000^2}{36}}}}=1.874

What is the p-value for this hypothesis test?

Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:

p_v =P(t_{70}>1.874)=0.033

Based on the p-value, what is your conclusion?

Comparing the p value with the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we see that p_v so we can conclude that we reject the null hypothesis, and the true mean for the downtown revenue restaurant seems higher than the true mean revenue for the freeway restaurant.

The best option would be:

Yes, since the test statistic value is greater than the critical value.

5 0
2 years ago
Evaluate the integral e^xy w region d xy=1, xy=4, x/y=1, x/y=2
LUCKY_DIMON [66]
Make a change of coordinates:

u(x,y)=xy
v(x,y)=\dfrac xy

The Jacobian for this transformation is

\mathbf J=\begin{bmatrix}\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}&\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial x}\\\\\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial y}&\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial y}\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}y&x\\\\\dfrac1y&-\dfrac x{y^2}\end{bmatrix}

and has a determinant of

\det\mathbf J=-\dfrac{2x}y

Note that we need to use the Jacobian in the other direction; that is, we've computed

\mathbf J=\dfrac{\partial(u,v)}{\partial(x,y)}

but we need the Jacobian determinant for the reverse transformation (from (x,y) to (u,v). To do this, notice that

\dfrac{\partial(x,y)}{\partial(u,v)}=\dfrac1{\dfrac{\partial(u,v)}{\partial(x,y)}}=\dfrac1{\mathbf J}

we need to take the reciprocal of the Jacobian above.

The integral then changes to

\displaystyle\iint_{\mathcal W_{(x,y)}}e^{xy}\,\mathrm dx\,\mathrm dy=\iint_{\mathcal W_{(u,v)}}\dfrac{e^u}{|\det\mathbf J|}\,\mathrm du\,\mathrm dv
=\displaystyle\frac12\int_{v=}^{v=}\int_{u=}^{u=}\frac{e^u}v\,\mathrm du\,\mathrm dv=\frac{(e^4-e)\ln2}2
8 0
3 years ago
Expression is equivalent to 486 – 9 + 6 + 33 × 2
mojhsa [17]

Answer:

  549

Step-by-step explanation:

A calculator can give you an equivalent expression.

I might work from the middle outward:

  = 486 -3 +33×2

  = 483 +66

  = (480 +60) + (3 +6)

  = 540 + 9

  = 549

7 0
3 years ago
The angles of elevation froma point X to the top of flagpoles A and B are 35* and 45* respectively. If X lies in the middle of t
BartSMP [9]

Let AB = t. And since X lies in the middle, so AX=BX = t/2 .

Let the height of the smaller flagpole is AO and of larger flagpole is BP .

Using tangent ratio rule in each triangle, we will get

tan 35 =\frac{AO}{t/2} , tan 45= \frac{BP}{t/2} // AO = \frac{t*tan35}{2},  BP=\frac{t*tan45}{2}

And there ratio is

\frac{AO}{BP}= \frac{tan 35}{tan 45}=\frac{0.7}{1}

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Branliest offered
    5·1 answer
  • A rhombus has coordinates A(-6, 3), B(-4, 4), C(-2, 3), D(-4, 2). What are the coordinates of rhombus A'B'C'D' AFTER A 90° COUNT
    11·1 answer
  • I need a lot of help please someone!
    14·1 answer
  • Ignore this pls . Z z z z z z
    5·2 answers
  • A question says "Mr. Dawson buys 3 packages of trading cards to divide evenly among his 4 grandchildren. There are 15 cards in e
    5·2 answers
  • Law of cosine find m<B a=11 b=12 c=17
    5·1 answer
  • The 2nd term of an arithmetic progression is (1/2) and the sum of the first 14th terms is -70. Find
    9·1 answer
  • Please help i need to finish this! thank you
    13·1 answer
  • Order the rational numbers below from greatest to least. -3/4 , .8, 1, -5.3 , 9. I'm not that smart so imma try to get this answ
    13·2 answers
  • Please solve this question, and explain how you got the answer ty
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!