Brutus and Cassius quarrel. Brutus accuses Cassius of having an itching palm which means he has taken some bribe in place of homage to power. Cassius is heartbroken to think that his dear friend Brutus is angry with him.
During the quarrel, the truth of Brutus' bad temperament is revealed. His precious Portia is dead. She has swallowed hot coals and killed herself.
Brutus has lost the most precious gift in his life. He has lost his beloved wife. He has no will to go on. He might as well be dead along with Portia. Through his grief, Cassius' faults are magnified. After much discourse, quarreling, Brutus admits his reason for being so indignant.
Cassius realizes that Brutus is commenting out of anger, hurt, and bereavement at losing his wife.
Brutus decides to put his anger aside and offers Cassius wine. The two share wine and a handshake. In the face of death, the two breach their divisions.
Cassius and Brutus have argued out of fear and grief. They reunite due to the fact that they are in this situation due to honorable qualities. They both desire that Rome 's countrymen be free from slavery.
Caesar had to die. Now Brutus and Cassius face death for protecting Rome from Caesar's ambition.
Brutus could resent Cassius for persuading him to take action against Caesar.
Was Caesar's death in vain? Will Brutus and Cassius lose the war? In death, Brutus and Cassius have reunited.
Answer:
B. your peice of cake is missing and your little sister has chocolate stains in her shirt
Explanation:
Answer:
its the last one Forage.
Explanation:
If your in the supermarket looking for anything that looks the best in shape like fruit, food, ect your looking through the aisle of the supermarket looking for the best piece of fruit, you would be foraging.
Social media is flooded with the “Happy Father’s Day” wishes today but do the youngsters of today’s generation mean this or the generation gap is causing trouble?? So,
Does the generation gap affect the relationship between parents and children?
First of all, a lot of factors depend on this matter. A child’s age his/her level of maturity upbringing and the people around are some of the factors.
Now the fact of the matter is that any age gap will have some effects either positive or negative on the relationship between them. But, one should also consider that no matter what the age of a parent is, the connection between them and their child is never lost. It remains forever. A mother who might be 50 years old when she gives birth to a baby has a forever connection from the very next second. Yes, the more the age gap between them, the more effort will be needed especially for the parents in this case to understand the cravings or desires of their child.
In my opinion, though I am no one, age doesn’t and can’t barricade a feeling known as LOVE. That is like the color of the blood. It will stay always the same. Whether the age gap is large or the color of the child and parents is opposite, LOVE IS LOVE. The feeling is the same mutually. No matter the age gap.
In previous generations about 50 60 years ago, people used to get married at age of 13 to 18. They will have their first child at a mere age of 15 to 20. So in that case there is no age or generation gap between the two, but still, they managed us and our parents pretty well. So these things do not matter if the feeling is strong. No connection stays strong for life. It has to be felt from within. Which only a child and parent share between them.
Age gaps sometimes can differentiate our point of view but not that bond we share.
Explanation:
In America’s Constitution, one of this era’s most accomplished constitutional law scholars, Akhil Reed Amar, gives the first comprehensive account of one of the world’s great political texts. Incisive, entertaining, and occasionally controversial, this “biography” of America’s framing document explains not only what the Constitution says but also why the Constitution says it.
We all know this much: the Constitution is neither immutable nor perfect. Amar shows us how the story of this one relatively compact document reflects the story of America more generally. (For example, much of the Constitution, including the glorious-sounding “We the People,” was lifted from existing American legal texts, including early state constitutions.) In short, the Constitution was as much a product of its environment as it was a product of its individual creators’ inspired genius.