Answer:
Global account structure.
Explanation:
Global account structure can be regarded as structure that enables the account that has been globally standardised or having compatible products as well as services in various locations at internationally level. Global Account Management enables Global account managers to navigate along with their teams the internal as well as external challenges. It should be noted that structure used to supply customers (often other MNEs) in a coordinated and consistent way across various countries is Global account structure.
False is the correct answer
Answer:
Doing a financial statement analysis.
Explanation:
Financial statements can be defined as a document used for the formal communication or disclosure of financial information and statements to present and potential users such as investors and creditors. These includes balance sheet, statement of retained earnings and income statement.
Financial statement analysis can be defined as the process of analyzing, estimating and reviewing the financial statements of a business firm or organization in order to make better economic decisions and profits in the future.
Hence, when creditors, managers, and investors look at expenses as a percentage of revenue, they are doing a financial statement analysis.
0.013 is the annualized rate of occurrence (ARO) for a natural disaster affecting an organization.
Annualised Rate of Occurrence (ARO): An expected frequency of the hazard occurring over the course of a year is known as the Annualised Rate of Occurrence (ARO). ALE is computed using ARO (annualized loss expectancy).
The annualised rate is applicable for a specific amount of time (less than 12 months). It is a mathematical extrapolation of an estimated yearly returns rate. In order to determine it, multiply the monthly change in returns rate by 12 to obtain the annual rate.
#SPJ4
Answer: $460 billion, but the effect would be larger if there were an investment accelerator.
Explanation:
If the MPC = 0.75 and there is no investment accelerator or crowding out, then a $115 billion increase in the government expenditures would result in the shift in the aggregate demand curve right by:
= $115 billion ÷ (1 - 0.75)
= $115 billion ÷ 0.25
= $115 billion × 1/0.25
= $115 billion / 0.25
= $460 billion.
Therefore, there'll be a shift in the aggregate demand curve right by $460 billion, but the effect would be larger if there were an investment accelerator
