Answer:
The overview of the given scenario is described in the explanation segment below.
Explanation:
The monopoly seems to be the owner and manager of the sole business that operates on either the marketplace (Industry).
The monopolist becomes making an extraordinary income. Balance requirements become MC = MR, MC reductions MR from underneath the.
The breakeven point would be where the expense of Average is equivalent to the value (Average Revenue-AR)
Closing down portion would be when the company is unable to cover the AR Cost i.e.
⇒ AR < AVC.
The normal monopoly would be when it has a large competitive edge over all the future entrants as either a barrier to the entrance of just about any new company, which prohibits any new installment including its company into the sector. It may even be attributable to someone's power over manufactured goods or perhaps the possession of environmental assets.
The limits of monopoly power are given below:
- This power is limited to something like the possibility of competitors.
- If alternatives are present mostly on the market, it's been difficult to retain the monopoly.
- Law facilitates the possibility of monopoly power.
Answer: b. Net requirements
Explanation: Lot sizing is used to consolidate the calculated net requirements by a certain unit. It puts into consideration cost reduction and work efficiency. One method of lot sizing is the lot-for-lot where the net requirements occurring for each period are the order quantity which generates greater volume of orders with smaller quantities per order and inventory investment as a result of ordering exact requirements only. The order sizes for component parts are essentially determined directly from net requirements.
Answer: option 3
Explanation:
Background to the case:
The cases involving the explosion of Ford Pinto's due to a defective fuel system design led to the debate of many issues, most centering around the use by Ford of a cost-benefit analysis and the ethics surrounding its decision not to upgrade the fuel system based on this analysis.
Basis of analysis:
Should a risk/benefit analysis be used in situations where a defect in manufacturing could lead to seriously bodily harm and even worse death, such as in the Ford Pinto situation?
Rule of the court:
There hasn’t really been a definite decision about the case and arguments both for and against such an analysis have been made. It is an economically efficient method which has been accepted by courts for numerous years, however, juries may not always agree, so companies should take this into account.
Discretion is expected to be used.
To keep the team on schedule, you propose that members use a LOG so the project will be completed on time.
ash transactions that encompass purchase as well as sale of long-term assets as well as current investments can be considered to classified as Investing activities.
- Investing activities can be regarded as one of the categories of net cash activities which is been reported by business on the cash flow statement.
- It is the purchase as well as sale of long-term assets at a given period.
Therefore, Investing activities is correct.
Learn more at:
brainly.com/question/13158188?referrer=searchResults
