To be honest, i think social class isn't really a problem in the Tenth story.
The story indeed told a story about a man from a rich family married a girl from a poor family. But the story revolve more around the role of gender within relationship, even though it's an old school one
hope this helps
The answer to this question is in Auden's words "for instance". His poem is not specifically about Icarus and his tragedy. It transcends this particular story, elevating its message to the highest, universal level. The poem is about suffering as an integral constituent of life. People are often completely unaware of other people's suffering. The Icarus motif is just an example, albeit a very drastic one. It serves as the poem's climax. The "delicate ship" is on its course and it keeps sailing, although the crew must have seen "a boy falling out of the sky". In other words, the strange death of a young boy changes nothing in the course of other people's lives. That is why, unlike Williams' poem, this one doesn't even have Icarus in its title, but the Museum. It deals with the relations of life vs. death and art vs. reality, rather than Icarus' tragic story.
Answer:
D) tyranny during Stalin’s dictatorship, in which he distorted the tenets of communism.
Explanation:
The answer is D) tyranny during Stalin’s dictatorship, in which he distorted the tenets of communism.
According to the passage Animal farm, communism according to his meaning was supposed to free people from terror, hardship, struggles but Stalin distorted the tenets of communism by tormenting, terrorizing the people, slaughtering them, impose so much hardship on them and sending them to the camp even killed them for having different ideas from his idea.
Answer:
I think it's the answer is b
The Supreme Court's decision in Plessy v. Ferguson was unconstitutional because since segregation laws did not provide equal protections or liberties to non-whites, the ruling was not consistent with the 14th Amendment.
In Plessy v. Ferguson's case in 1896, America's Supreme Court established that as long as there was equality, racially separated facilities were not unconstitutional. According to the Court, segregation did not discriminate.
But actually, the separate facilities granted to African Americans were infrequently equal. Normally they were far from being equal, or were completely inexistent.
Distribution of education budget in Florida, for example, was extremely different depending on the race: whereas white people counted on a budget of over 70 million dolars for their schools, libraries, and more, black people counted on a budget of less than 5 million. They teached and learned in churchs, huts, and shelters without bathrooms, water supply, desks or chalkboards.
This principle of "separate but equal" was only employed to reaffirm white majority supremacy over black minority, and was eventually abandoned in 1954.
