1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Jlenok [28]
3 years ago
15

Which side, North or South, had the economic advantage at the beginning of the Civil War?

History
2 answers:
AysviL [449]3 years ago
8 0
The south because they relied on trade
navik [9.2K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The north always had a better advantage during the Civil War. The south had more moral motives and home field advantage. The North had more people to fight but I believe they didn't volunteer till the war became about the moral issue of slavery. So the best answer would be: The North because they could manufacture materials to support troops... also because that is best connected to economic reasons.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Define the Truman doctrine how was it implemented in Berlin?
andrew11 [14]
Truman implemented this in response to two threats one being a communist-led uprising against the government in Greece and two being Soviet demands for some control of Turkey's Dardanelles. It was implemented in Berlin when Truman ordered U.S. planes to fly supplies to the people of West Berlin in response to the Soviet Union's 11 month blockade on Berlin.. or something among those lines
5 0
3 years ago
Flase. because a lot people hated napoleon because he was better than everyone and he did things that no one could do
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

yes it's true

Explanation:

because he was not good

3 0
3 years ago
How did the Age of Exploration contribute to European involvement in the<br> African slave trade?
Andreyy89
The Europeans came into contact with African slave traders while exploring the coast of Africa.
7 0
3 years ago
Although 150 nations signed the Kyoto Protocol, which aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions,
Andreas93 [3]

Answer:

the United States failed to ratify this treaty.

Explanation:

When the protocol was first signed in 1997, president Bill Clinton signed alongside all the other leaders. But Congress didn't ratify it and then in 2001, President George Bush Jr rejected the treaty altogether. Bush claimed that the protocol was inefficient, but did not take any alternative measures.

The protocol went into effect in 2004, but evidence shows it has been unable to curb the emission of CO2.

In 2013 there was another attempt, but this time neither Russia nor the US ratified it.

5 0
3 years ago
According to the Constitution, any person that a State allows to vote for members
alukav5142 [94]

Answer:

The answer is b.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Jungle by Upton Sinclair was actually a novel (fiction) about immigrants and working class poverty, but it has a section abo
    8·1 answer
  • What economic system was used to reshape China’s economy after the civil war?
    9·1 answer
  • The IMMEDIATE cause of the stock market crash before the Great Depression in 1929 was:
    7·1 answer
  • What effect did the growth of railroads have on the nation’s urbanization?
    9·2 answers
  • What Supreme Court case determined that all states must follow the exclusionary rule regarding evidence that can be used in cour
    8·1 answer
  • The _____ is an era of human history lasting until about 10,000 B.C.
    10·1 answer
  • The first species that is believed to have walked upright is
    8·1 answer
  • How many classes were in Rome after 750 B.C.?<br><br> 4<br> 2<br> 3<br> 1
    12·2 answers
  • What is the name of the image below?
    6·1 answer
  • What was the order of the main events around the Haymarket Riot ? Explain what happened before , during , and after the riot .
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!