1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
asambeis [7]
3 years ago
15

How does geography affect where people settle?

History
1 answer:
krek1111 [17]3 years ago
6 0

Geography is a very important part of choosing where you would like to settle. There are many components that factor into everyday life that are very important, like agriculture, food, and climate.

The climate is different in different parts of the world. For example, if you prefer cold climates you would settle up North, but if you were to prefer hotter climates you would most likely settle in the South. The climate also changes the soil and farming.

Due to the warmer climate, soil in the South is richer and better for agricultural purposes. This was why the South was more focused on farming and agriculture, while the North got their income from industrialization.

Different animals and plants are in different regions as well. Different species of animals will reside in different areas and different plants may prefer certain climates.

If you are planning on farming, you will prefer very large flat plains. If you plan to live in the mountains you may live somewhere bumpy and rocky.

You might be interested in
while this country never formally joined to Axis Powers or joined World War ll, it did form an alliance with Germany and did in
Otrada [13]

Axis would have probably wiped out most of its West-European enemies. Canada would probably have tried to fight against America and failed, getting its armies crushed, or stayed on the defensive. Hitler would probably have had more troops and peace of  mind tromping around around the Soviet grounds, and would have lost a lot less manpower than when the US actually went to war in the real WWII. Since I'm assuming that in this hypothetical scenario, the US was allied with Japan, Pearl Harbor never happened. Japan and America would both have undisputed hold of the Pacific, with America's (unsunken) battleships and aircraft carriers along with Japanese suprbattleships like the Yamato, and dual force garrisons on the pacific islands. America might have invaded the lower Americas as well, if it didn't stop at securing the border. Mexico might have joined in to help the Axis powers. Then Hitler would still turn on Stalin, still loose an ungodly portion of his army in Russia, get driven back, and start losing the war in the European theatre, at least until axis forces come to back him up, primarily in the form of American Axis soldiers. Then America would lose many men in the Russian front, until it finally invaded Russia somehow (probably after many years and the combined nuclear armaments research being conducted by the US and Nazi Germany.) After invading Russia, Hitler will grow pompous and attempt to invade America with his already weakened force. He would attempt to destroy the remaining American troops in the European/Asian Theatre. America and Japan would probably ally with each other to maintain their hold of the Pacific, and fight back, with a smaller scale D-Day happening (Only made up of Americans) being launched from the invaded and annexed New American Britain or New German Britain or whatever. America would invade Germany, while Germany cannot invade America (see other Quora posts for explanations on why it is virtually impossible to invade America). America ends up with territories and troops spread all across the Pacific, Africa, Russia, Europe, and Asia, with probably troops in Canada and Mexico as well. Consequently, the troops will be brought down through the freedom fighters and rebellions that will ultimately pop up. Hitler shoots himself in the bunker as well.

Lots of bloodshed. Thank god it didn't happen this way! A lot of countries would be utterly in ruins after this version of the World War, not just Poland and Germany and England and Russia and Korea and China (etc.), but who knows how many more countless places. Not to say that I am okay with WWII happening how it did anyway, since it was extremely bloody as well, but... the real WWII was a giant bloody clash of death. This hypothetical one wouldn't have been a clash. It would have been a giant cluster that resulted in possibly twice or three times as many deaths, mostly more civilian deaths in general.

5 0
3 years ago
The overall literacy rate for Europe is<br> O 20%<br> O 100%<br> o 90%<br> O 50%
Tomtit [17]
90% the third answer choice
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
By 1850, how many blacks were slaves in the United States?
romanna [79]

Answer:

C. 3 million

Explanation:

Conducted by the Census Office, it determined the resident population of the United States to be 23,191,876—an increase of 35.9 percent over the 17,069,453 persons enumerated during the 1840 Census. The total population included 3,204,313 slaves.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is an example of economic interdependence during World War II?
natta225 [31]

Answer:

d) american companies continuing to trade with countries fighting with germany

Explanation:

6 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
In the north American colonies, what was a charter company
Dvinal [7]
A company for and by shareholders for the purpose of trade ,eploration,and colonisation
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did jefferson and madison support the french during and after the french revolution? (select 2)?
    5·1 answer
  • Who wrote the Confessions?
    12·2 answers
  • Which political reform was an election in which citizens themselves voted to select nominees for upcoming elections? direct prim
    9·2 answers
  • How did Jim Crow laws affect the African Americans living in the South after Reconstruction?
    8·2 answers
  • Companies hired Pinkertons to
    12·2 answers
  • The eastern roman empire fell shortly after the western roman empire T or F
    7·1 answer
  • How did France and England attempt to strengthen their grip on the Ohio territory? a. They built as many forts as possible. b. T
    13·1 answer
  • The Declaration of Independence is
    14·2 answers
  • How was the black figure vase different from the red figure
    15·2 answers
  • Who is the father of history​
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!