Answer:
a) 83%
b) 0.892
Step-by-step explanation:
percentage that attends class on friday = 74%
percentage that pass because they attend class on friday = 88%
percentage that pass but did not go to school on friday = 20%
a) percentage of students expected to pass the course
= (74% x 88%) +(88% x 20%)
= 0.6512 + 0.176
= 0.8272
= 83%
b) If a person passes the course, what is the probability that he/she attended classes on Fridays
= 74% divided by 83%
= 0.892
Answer:
8 number of visits will be the total cost of the visits (including the price of the discount card) be less expensive for a family of 2 adults and 1 child if they have purchased the discount card
Step-by-step explanation:
Price without Discount Card Price with Discount Card
Ticket (12 & Under) $10 $8
Adult's Ticket $15 $12
Let x be the number of visits
Price without discount card for 2 adults and 1 child ticket
Price without discount for x visits = 
Price with discount for x visits =
Now to find For what number of visits will the total cost of the visits (including the price of the discount card) be less expensive for a family of 2 adults and 1 child if they have purchased the discount card
57+32x< 40x
57<8x
7.1<x
So, 8 number of visits will be the total cost of the visits (including the price of the discount card) be less expensive for a family of 2 adults and 1 child if they have purchased the discount card
Answer:
C) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean attendance is greater than 523.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let μ be the the average attendance at games of the football team
The claim: the average attendance at games is over 523
Null and alternative hypotheses are:
: μ=523
: μ>523
The conclusion is failure to reject the null hypothesis.
This means that <em>test statistic</em> is lower than <em>critical value</em>. Therefore it is not significant, there is no significant evidence to accept the <em>alternative</em> hypothesis.
That is no significant evidence that the average attendance at games of the football team is greater than 523.
Answer:
I'm not sure what your asking, but, no, all rectangles are parallelograms.
I found this over the internet, and I hope it helps you understand why a rectangle is always a parallelogram, but a parallelogram is not always a rectangle:
It is true that every rectangle is a parallelogram, but it is not true that every parallelogram is not a rectangle. For instance, take a square. It's a parallelogram — it is a quadrilateral with two pairs of parallel faces. But it is also a rectangle — it is a quadrilateral with four right angles.
I am only in middle school, this question is for college. sorry