No because 4=4.00000 and there is that much more than 4.00000 so 4.002 is more
Simplifying h(x) gives
h(x) = (x² - 3x - 4) / (x + 2)
h(x) = ((x² + 4x + 4) - 4x - 4 - 3x - 4) / (x + 2)
h(x) = ((x + 2)² - 7x - 8) / (x + 2)
h(x) = ((x + 2)² - 7 (x + 2) - 14 - 8) / (x + 2)
h(x) = ((x + 2)² - 7 (x + 2) - 22) / (x + 2)
h(x) = (x + 2) - 7 - 22/(x + 2)
h(x) = x - 5 - 22/(x + 2)
An oblique asymptote of h(x) is a linear function p(x) = ax + b such that

In the simplified form of h(x), taking the limit as x gets arbitrarily large, we obviously have -22/(x + 2) converging to 0, while x - 5 approaches either +∞ or -∞. If we let p(x) = x - 5, however, we do have h(x) - p(x) approaching 0. So the oblique asymptote is the line y = x - 5.
The answer is: y = -3/2 x + 8
Graph:
To find the answer we use the formula;
y-y1 = M1 (x - x1)
y-2 = -3/2 (x-4)
When fully solved: the answer is:
y = -3/2 x + 8
Add the two values being multiplied by m
37.26 + 2.7 = 39.96
39.96 m + 0.0015 is the most simplified you can get without having a way of finding the value of m. I apologize if I am mistaken, but I'm fairly certain! :)
Answer:
They surveyed 300 students
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to find this, take the number who said they speak Spanish and then divide that number by the percentage.
36 students / 12% = 300 total students.