Tevye's analogy is faulty in this situation because "Tevye's analogy is supporting the idea of marrying only Jews; however, it does not explain
the reason why this is supposed to happen".
<h3>How Tevye's analogy is different</h3>
Tevye's analogy is faulty in this situation because it doesn't give reasons to why one is supposed to "seek his own kind".
It is good to seek one's own kind so as to avoid the cultural problem in marriage. It helps to solve the problem of origin differences.
Culture is very important in any relationship. In order not to have different perspectives on an issue, it is ideal to go into relationships with people of the same culture.
Learn more about analogy:
brainly.com/question/13978016
The answer is B. pace you reset so you are not talking too fast
<span>A microscope is considered a simple light microscope because it contains one lens and uses light to examine objects, they can see up to 1500 times better than the human eye. The began making conclusion about the organization of living matter.</span>
health insurance is where you have money and of which you use for your health, physical or mental. in my own words
Answer:
Red meat was expensive, and only the rich could afford it
Explanation:
The Elizabethans ate three meals a day like anyone else, the meals varying from a chord to their riches among families. Poorer people could only buy vegetables and white meat such as fish, chicken and rabbits while the rich could eat red meat more consistently. In 1563 Elizabeth created a law that compelled everyone to eat fish meat every Wednesday, Fridays and Saturdays by encouraging the fish industry and reducing the fish price to the poor.
