Answer:
The Committees of Correspondence were the American colonies’ means for maintaining communication lines in the years before the Revolutionary War. In 1764, Boston formed the earliest Committee of Correspondence to encourage opposition to Britain’s stiffening of customs enforcement and prohibition of American paper money. The following year, New York formed a similar committee to keep the other colonies notified of its actions in resisting the Stamp Act. In 1773, the Virginia House of Burgesses proposed that each colonial legislature appoint a committee for intercolonial correspondence. The exchanges that followed built solidarity during the turbulent times and helped bring about the formation of the First Continental Congress in 1774.
<span>Foremost, the Mongols produced a charismatic leader, Genghis Khan, who united the Mongol tribes in a dream of conquest and expansion.The Mongolian horse, a small and very tough infantry horse which could move very quickly and run long distances. Mongol troops were all horse-mounted and could move very quickly.The Mongol bow was a very small composite bow which could accurately shoot an arrow more than 200 yards. Combined with the fast-moving horse mounted infantry, the Mongols had a great advantage.Mongol tactics focused on speed and mobility. If a city quickly surrendered, they were lenient, but if it resisted, they were ruthless.<span>When necessary, the Mongols were willing to co-opt needed talent. For instance, when they needed to lay siege to a city, they would rely on Chinese siege engineers to lay siege to Baghdad. Compared to the empires they conquered, they weren't racist in how they used people.</span></span>
I wanna help you but this essay takes along time
The correct answer to this question is that that Claudius felt the ruin
of Athens was due to the fact they refused to grant citizenship to
foreigners. In a way, this was probably true, in that by not allowing
foreigners to enter they halted the growth of Athens, which meant the
city became stagnant.
Answer:
The Court generally identifies these categories as obscenity, defamation, fraud, incitement, fighting words, true threats, speech integral to criminal conduct . The contours of these categories have changed over time, with many having been significantly narrowed by the Court.Explanation:
