Answer:
The correct answer is option D.
Explanation:
A monopoly firm is neither productively nor allocative efficient. The reason behind this is that it does not utilize the resources efficiently and produces below the socially optimal level of output.
Unlike perfect competition, which produces at the point where price equals marginal cost, a monopolist produces at the point where the price is greater than marginal cost.
This inefficiency is visible through the decrease in consumer surplus and deadweight loss. The difference between socially optimal level of output and monopoly output also represents inefficiency. The value of the goods and services that could have been made if monopolist chose to produce at a socially optimal level also shows inefficiency.
Answer: The Option "d.returning inventory that is defective or broken" is NOT an example of safeguarding inventory.
Explanation: If we analyze the statements:
a.physical devices such as two-way mirrors, cameras, and alarms - These are all tools intended for protection against possible inventory theft.
b.storing inventory in restricted areas - Restricting access only to inventory-enabled personnel is able to protect the inventory much more than if anyone can access it.
c.matching receiving documents, purchase orders, and vendor's invoice - Controlling each of the purchase documents and performing the physical count reduces the possibilities of inventory differences for losses or errors.
d.returning inventory that is defective or broken - Returning the defective inventory is a post-echo action that occurred due to the unprotection of the inventory, therefore it could not be referred to as an example of inventory protection.
Answer:
The correct answer is $132,664.89.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Present value (PV) = $50,000
Rate of interest (r) = 5%
Time period (n) = 20 Years
So, we can calculate future value by using following formula:
Future value = PV × (1 + r)^(n)
= $50000 × ( 1 + 5% )^20
= $50000 × (1 + 0.05)^20
= $132,664.89
Hence, After 20 years land will be worth $132,664.89.
Answer:
Weighted-average inventory costing method Ending Inventory = $ 9666.67= $ 9667
Explanation:
Date Particulars Units Unit Cost Total Cost
January 31 Purchases 300 $ 60 $ 18,000
February 28 Purchases 150 $ 25 $3750
Total 450 $ 21,750
Weighted-average inventory costing method= Total Cost/ Total Units=
$ 21,750/450= $48.33 purchase price per unit
Sales 250 units at $ 70 = $ 17500
Ending Units = Purchases-Sales = 450-250= 200
Weighted-average inventory costing method Ending Inventory = $ 9666.67
200 units at 448.33= $ 9666.67= $ 9667
Answer:
$2,266,123.60
Explanation:
As it is given
Return on sales = Net income ÷ Sales
3.56% = $110,000 ÷ Sales
So, the sales is $3,089,887.64
Now the Gross Profit percentage is
Gross Profit percentage = Gross profit ÷ Sales
26.66% = Gross profit ÷ $3,089,887.64
So, the gross profit
= $823,764.044
Now the cost of goods sold is
= Sales - gross profit
= $3,089,887.64 - $823,764.044
= $2,266,123.60
