No..... If they're illegal, what's the point?
The answer is A.<span>concurring opinion supports a Supreme Court ruling, while a dissenting opinion opposes it
In concurring opinion, the judges will support the the decision by the court but with different basis/reasonns for its support.
In dissenting opinion on the hand, the judges are disagree with the decision by the court, but it wouldn't affect the previous outcome.</span>
I believe the answer is: They are based on the arbitrary borders of old European empires
African continent was colonized by different european empire. To avoid conflicts among the european, they divided africa into several territories and dtermine which country has the jurisdiction over each territories. After African nations gained independence, they still use this separation as borders to differentiate one country with another.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Madison argued strongly for a strong central government that would unify the country. So, it makes sense that D, should states be tied together loosely or strongly, is the right answer
Answer:
- Evoking the spirit of Independence
- Promoting democracy as part of their foreign policies
Explanation:
- Evoking the spirit of Independence
Nationalist leaders believe that every policies that a nation made should be first and foremost would benefit our own nation.
This perspective were really needed during the period when United States still under the rule of the British colony. At that time, they were taking advantage of American people, Taxing us with a really high rate without providing us with comparable incentives.
Nationalist leaders managed to show this flaw to a lot of people and encourage them to join them in the fight for independence.
- Promoting democracy as part of their foreign policies
American nationalist leaders also play apart in introducing democracy to various countries across the world. They manage to influence many countries to adopt a democratic form in order to give more power to the people within the government.
