Answer: The legal prevention of alcohol may prove beneficial, alcohol is unhealthy and can cause serious problems. Intoxication leads to poor decisions that can take lives. Also, drinking problems lead to death simply by alcohol poisoning. 25% of all traffic related deaths are linked to intoxication. 29 people per day die due to this. Underage drinking can be prevented as well, protecting young minds from damage by alcohol.
I listed a few more than 2.. but I hope this helps :)
1. A lot of housewives during the time were actually for the prohibition act. They had dealt with husbands that had come back drunk or otherwise and would abuse them some of the times. With alcohol harder to obtain, that was a good thing for them.
2. If you are a organized crime leader, the prohibiton act was amazing for you. The distribution of liquor and alcohol during the prohibition act was amazing for organized crime bosses and gangs. A great example were the “hidden bars” that would be popping up around New York and larger cities.
I hope those arguments for it can help!
Explanation:
Personally I believe the prohibition act was a bad idea, but I listed some arguments for it above...
The idea of humanism is mostly adeptly reflected in Renaissance art by a focus on the body itself, especially with sculpture, where many detailed portraits of the human body (such as the David) were created.
Despite their geographical proximity, Japan and China are very different countries, with unique historic, political and social features. While China is one of the largest communist countries in the world, Japan is a – rather open – parliamentary constitutional monarchy.
