A Review and Reconceptualization of Cultural Appropriation:
INTERPRETATION-
Cultural Appropriation is often mentioned but undertheorized in critical rhetorical and media studies. Defined as the use of a culture’s symbols, artifacts, genres, rituals, or technologies by members of another culture.
Cultural Appropriation can be placed into 4 categories:
- Exchange.
- Dominance.
- Exploitation.
- Transculturation.
Although each of these types can be understood as relevant to particular contexts or eras, transculturation questions the bounded and proprietary view of culture embedded in other types of appropriation.
Transculturation posits culture as a relational phenomenon constituted by acts of appropriation, not an entity that merely participates in appropriation. Tensions exist between the need to challenge essentialism and the use of essentialist notions such as ownership and degradation to criticize the exploitation of colonized cultures.
Learn more about Cultural Appropriation on:
brainly.com/question/3840082
#SPJ4
Explanation:
offshoring = The location of a business in another country for tax purposes or lowering production costs.
Answer:
first military conflicts between the Colonial rebel forces and Great Britain during the Revolutionary War
Explanation:
it happened april 19 1775
Answer:
Both of her parents have a cleft chin but she doesn't
Explanation:
<u>Alleles </u>
C - NOT a cleft chin (dominant gene)
c - a cleft Chin (recessive gene)
<u>Possibilities of Genotype</u>
CC - NOT a Cleft chin
Cc - NOT a Cleft chin (since C is dominant )
cc - a Cleft chin
Now, we both know that her parents have Cleft chin, which means that both of them could only have cc as their genotype.
This mean, if they have children ,both the father and the mother could only give c alleles. This make the possibilities of their child having a cleft chin become 100%.
If the girl does not have a cleft chin, we can say that she is 100% not the biological child of the parents.
A colony is like one of many stars in the sky
