Saudi Arabia would be the correct answer here.
Since Baltimore handed the first living wage law in 1994, several dozen cities passed similar laws in the late 1990s and the 2000s.
<h3>The Living Wage Law</h3>
The Living Wage Law mandates certain employers that receive at least $1 million of economic assistance from the City or a City financial development entity to pay no smaller than the living wage to their employees at the project site unless the employer allows for certain immunities.
<h3>What defines a living wage?</h3>
A living wage is a socially adequate level of income that provides adequate coverage for basic conditions such as food, shelter, child services, and healthcare. The living wage standard permits for no more than 30% to be spent on rent or a mortgage and is sufficiently more elevated than the poverty level.
To learn more about the living wage law visit the link
brainly.com/question/17895160
#SPJ4
Answer:
im sorry i speak English i cant answer im sorry
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Were political machines during the gilded age bad for their communities, or were they necessary evil and a way for ordinary people to improve their lot in life?
I consider that somewhat they benefited in some aspects of the communities but the issue was that political machines were really interested in their own agendas and political influence. These political machines used the benefit of the community as an excuse or as a facade to cover their real intentions.
For instance, let's remember the case of the political machine known as Tammany Hall that gained so much power in New York City and exerted its power and control over politicians.
The answer to this would be C Joel’s group ran farther because 3/4 > 3/5
