The correct answer is C. A government should do a few checks and balances.
Explanation
The founders of the United States were a group of thinkers and politicians who opposed the British colony in the North American territory and who fought against it to achieve independence. Also, they established a new democratic government in the thirteen colonies that existed at that time, to have a balanced and interrelated power. This system was influenced by the French Revolution that abolished the monarchical system and that served as inspiration for the independence of many colonies around the world, mainly in America. Therefore, the founders of the United States would agree with statement C. A government should do a few checks and balances because they chose to implement the democratic model in the Constitution of the United States since its foundation. After all, this offered "The Constitution separates the government's power into three branches. Each branch has separate responsibilities, but they all must interact with each other in different ways. This separation of powers includes a system of checks and balances, which are ways that each branch can limit the others ".
Under the Constitution, the House of Representatives has the power to impeach a government official, in effect serving as prosecutor. The senate has the sole power to conduct impeachment trials, essentially serving as jury and judge.
Answer:
Explanation:
Consequentialism is the view that morality is all about producing the right kinds of overall consequences. Here the phrase “overall consequences” of an action means everything the action brings about, including the action itself. For example, if you think that the whole point of morality is (a) to spread happiness and relieve suffering, or (b) to create as much freedom as possible in the world, or (c) to promote the survival of our species, then you accept consequentialism. Although those three views disagree about which kinds of consequences matter, they agree that consequences are all that matters. So, they agree that consequentialism is true. The utilitarianism of John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham is a well known example of consequentialism. By contrast, the deontological theories of John Locke and Immanuel Kant are nonconsequentialist.
Consequentialism is controversial. Various nonconsequentialist views are that morality is all about doing one’s duty, respecting rights, obeying nature, obeying God, obeying one’s own heart, actualizing one’s own potential, being reasonable, respecting all people, or not interfering with others—no matter the consequences.
This article describes different versions of consequentialism. It also sketches several of the most popular reasons to believe consequentialism, along with objections to those reasons, and several of the most popular reasons to disbelieve it, along with objections to those reasons.
The Industrial Revolution had a positive impact on women because it allowed women to move from a domestic sphere environment a public sphere environment, it allowed women to be more politically engaged, and due to independent wages, gave them a sense of independence.
