Answer:
Hope this helps 0>0
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x represent the number of sales each man had.
For Salesman A, he earns $65 per sale; this is 65x.
For Salesman B, he earns $40 per sale; this is 40x. We also add to this his weekly salary of $300; this gives us 40x+300.
Since their pay was equal, set the two expressions equal:
65x = 40x+300
Subtract 40x from each side:
65x-40x = 40x+300-40x
25x = 300
Divide both sides by 25:
25x/25 = 300/25
x = 12
: Let y = f(x) = x^1/3
Then dy = 1/3*x^(−2/3) dx
Since f(64) = 4.
We take x = 64 and dx = ∆x = 1
This gives dy = 1/3*(64)^(−2/3)* (1) = 1/48
∴65^(1/3) = f(64 + 1) ≈ f(64) + dy = 4 + 1/48 ≈ 4.021 <span>
</span>
The best answer from the options that proves that the residual plot shows that the line of best fit is appropriate for the data is: ( Statement 1 ) Yes, because the points have no clear pattern
X Given Predicted Residual value
1 3.5 4.06 -0.56
2 2.3 2.09 0.21
3 1.1 0.12 0.98
4 2.2 -1.85 4.05
5 -4.1 -3.82 -0.28
The residual value is calculated as follows using this formula: ( Given - predicted )
1) ( 3.5 - 4.06 ) = -0.56
2) ( 2.3 - 2.09 ) = 0.21
3) ( 1.1 - 0.12 ) = 0.98
4) (2.2 - (-1.85) = 4.05
5) ( -4.1 - (-3.82) = -0.28
Residual values are the difference between the given values and the predicted values in a given data set and the residual plot is used to represent these values .
attached below is the residual plot of the data set
hence we can conclude from the residual plot attached below that the line of best fit is appropriate for the data because the points have no clear pattern ( i.e. scattered )
learn more about residual plots : brainly.com/question/16821224
28 times 5 because volume= length times width times height. Brainliest?