The three Results of the Catholic Reformation were the formation of Jesuits,Papacy and Council of trent.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- Before the Catholic reformation, all people were united under the roman catholic (RC) church which was organized by the pope. This catholic reformation was founded to be a counterforce against Protestantism.
- The formation of the council Trent was the main response from the catholic church for the reformation. This council opposed the doctrines raised and supported by reformers.
- It became the reason for the foundation of Protestantism (Jesuits ) which is said to be one of the important branches of Christianity.
Cecil Rhodes is an imperialist, financier, and mining magnate.She founded <span>British South </span>Africa Company.<span>He founded the </span>Rhodes<span> scholarships too.</span>
Explanation:
The Constitution, through the Fourth Amendment, protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The Fourth Amendment, however, is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures, but only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law.
Answer:
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that the Constitution of the United States was not meant to include American citizenship for black people, regardless of whether they were enslaved or free, and therefore the rights and privileges it confers upon American citizens could not apply to them.[2][3] The decision was made in the case of Dred Scott, an enslaved black man whose owners had taken him from Missouri, which was a slave-holding state, into the Missouri Territory, most of which had been designated "free" territory by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. When his owners later brought him back to Missouri, Scott sued in court for his freedom, claiming that because he had been taken into "free" U.S. territory, he had automatically been freed, and was legally no longer a slave. Scott sued first in Missouri state court, which ruled that he was still a slave under its law. He then sued in U.S. federal court, which ruled against him by deciding that it had to apply Missouri law to the case. He then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court
Hey there!
Your answer is B.
If the Supreme Court becomes more diverse, then as a result equal protection for minorities will probably come as a result. More people will get the opportunities they need with diverse people representing them.
Hope this helps!
