1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dybincka [34]
3 years ago
6

Parking in front of a fire hydrant A. Moving Violation B. Non-Moving Violation

Law
2 answers:
Kazeer [188]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

B

Explanation:

AlekseyPX3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

B.

Explanation:

Your car isn't moving

You might be interested in
Which learning style is best suited by the study of Graphs,
Mashcka [7]
I think it’s the first one
5 0
3 years ago
As compared to the opportunist robber, the professional robber is more likely to be older and have a prior arrest record.
Katena32 [7]

Answer:

B false

Explanation:

because if it was a professional robbee he would not have been caught before or have a prior arrest record

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Dawn was driving down the road when she spotted a one-car accident and a woman named Sarah on the side of the road. Dawn stopped
vazorg [7]

Answer:

c. Dawn would have been obligated to assist Sarah under the European bystander rule

Explanation:

The bystander rule is a type of rule which states that a person generally has no legal obligation to rescue, save or assist another (victim) who is in danger or at risk, even if the society imposes a moral responsibility to act as such.

This is known as the American bystander rule and is opposite from the European rule which mandates intervention and assistance, the European version of this rule is called the Good Samaritan rule

so under the European bystander/Good Samaritan rule, Dawn would have been obligated to assist Sarah.

6 0
3 years ago
What is one thing the Federal Government system can do to ease Mass Incarceration?
Trava [24]

Answer:

*Eliminate prison for lower-level crimes

Explanation: Prison is often the default criminal justice sanction when someone breaks the law. It shouldn’t be that way. For those who commit a lower-level crime like drug possession, petty theft, or selling marijuana, prison is not just unfair, it is also a bad sanction for society at large.Prison costs $31,000 a year per prisoner, and often does little to prevent re-offense for these crimes. Probation, treatment, or community service are all more appropriate for many lower-level crimes, not to mention much cheaper (probation is 10 times less expensive). State legislatures and Congress should change sentencing laws to make alternatives to prison the default penalty for certain lower-level crimes, like drug possession and petty theft.

*Reduce sentence minimums and maximums currently on the books

Explanation: If someone commits a serious crime, like robbery, they should be punished. But there’s little evidence that staying in prison for such long periods of time, such as the 20 or 30-year sentences imposed, will rehabilitate prisoners. In fact, research indicates that longer stays in prison do not lead to lower recidivism. Sometimes, longer stays can even increase recidivism. With prison stays growing longer each year, lawmakers should consider reducing the time many inmates spend behind bars when it’s not necessary. State and federal legislatures should reduce the minimum and maximum sentencing guidelines, and make them more proportional to the crimes committed. We suggest in the report that legislators consider a 25 percent cut as a starting point for the six major crimes (aggravated assault, drug trafficking, murder, non-violent weapons offenses, robbery and serious burglary) that make up the bulk of the nation’s current prison population. This will make our system smarter while still protecting public safety.

*Prosecutors should seek lower penalties when appropriate

Explanation: Prosecutors should use their discretion to implement the recommendations in our report. Their sentencing recommendations should not simply aim to put defendants behind bars for the longest time possible. The best way to keep us all safe is for prosecutors to seek the most proportional punishment – one that fits the crime — not simply the harshest one.

*Eliminate “Three Strikes Laws” and “Truth in Sentencing”

Explanation: Both policies take away the ability of judges to properly asses the appropriate sentence for defendants in the criminal justice system. We should trust our judges to make these decisions instead of forcing an inappropriate sentence with set-in-stone rules.

*Reinvest savings into crime prevention polices

Explanation: The recommendations in the recent Brennan Center report would save almost $20 billion dollars a year. We should reinvest those savings into police, schools, and reentry programs, which will help improve public safety even more. $20 billion could cover 270,000 police officers, 327,000 teachers, or 360,000 probation officers. Most experts agree that these investments better prevent crime than prison.

^^ here are a few :)

3 0
3 years ago
Which of these action would be protected by the first amendment
oksian1 [2.3K]

Answer:

Explanation:

where is the picture and without it people wont be able to help u

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A sworn officer is so called because he or she
    12·1 answer
  • What is the F temperature at 80 C?
    5·2 answers
  • all new bills are given a letter and number code following their coding they are then to committees for closer inspection
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement is NOT correct regarding the arrest of suspects?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the difference between public forum and private property?
    6·1 answer
  • Hey guys just wanted to know if Yall can help me to know something, so I was on a soccer game and a kid pushed me on purpose and
    9·2 answers
  • Freè points<br>for everyone ​
    10·2 answers
  • No state in the US allows the Governor to directly select people to serve as judges. Group of answer choices true false
    15·1 answer
  • How many court systems are there in the united states.
    11·1 answer
  • Secondary sources of law: Group of answer choices are looked to when there is no primary source of law that applies to the facts
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!