1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergejj [24]
3 years ago
15

When can the law be opposed ?

History
1 answer:
kirill [66]3 years ago
7 0
Because of the many good things associated with the rule of law, by some accounts today it is the world’s preeminent legitimating political ideal. People in leadership roles just about everywhere claim to aspire to it. Respect for the rule of law is a sign of political maturity. It’s an idea for grown ups.
You might be interested in
Generally republicans. Who is a person who believes government power, particularly in the
Serga [27]

Answer:

I don't know exactly what you mean but i would say i conservative.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Why did Anderson move to Fort
zlopas [31]

Answer:

the answer is A

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did labor specialization lead to a diverse economy in west Africa?
Gelneren [198K]
In Africa, a number of specialized occupations developed ,highly skilled metal smiths developed more effcient tool that  increase agricultral produtivity. they also produce improved weapons ,which  became important in the expansion of kingdoms.
8 0
3 years ago
Holocaust
Hunter-Best [27]
Hitler, and natzies
8 0
3 years ago
Were the terms of the Treaty of Versailles the proper ones to maintain peace in Europe after WWI? If yes, argue why and use spec
Elina [12.6K]

No.

The Treaty of Versailles (1919) was a peace treaty signed by the European powers that officially ended World War I.

After six months of negotiations in Paris, the treaty was signed as a continuation of the November 1918 armistice in Compiègne, which had put an end to the clashes. The main point of the treaty required Germany to accept all responsibility for causing the war and, under the terms of articles 231-247, to make reparations to a number of nations of the Triple Entente.

Although the Versailles treatment was a good one, it was a way of blaming Germany and punishing it, but I don't think it's possible to say that there was peace when years later the World War II happened. They should have proposed an agreement between all countries and not just as a way of holding Germany alone.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Following the battle of stalingrad
    15·2 answers
  • Explain how otto von bismarck brought about the crowning of king william 1 of prussia as kaiser of the second reich.
    13·1 answer
  • Who were so gods in ancient Greece
    13·1 answer
  • Amar is a farmer in _____. He is happy that another citizen in his empire recently invented the wheel because it has made his li
    9·1 answer
  • a u.s. navy destroyer recently witnessed an extremely close overflight by unarmed fighter jets from what country?
    9·1 answer
  • What religion spread from india to china , then japan ?
    11·2 answers
  • What are examples where law and morality reinforce one another?
    6·1 answer
  • Are the statements about the effects of railroads in the late 1800s true or false? Check off those that are true.
    12·2 answers
  • Consider the poen's, short stories, and autobiographical pieces you read from the first half of the twentieth
    14·1 answer
  • How did most state constitutions influence American government ideals?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!