1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
goblinko [34]
3 years ago
7

what can oral tradition tell me about human history? PLEASEEEEE help i have like 60 missing assignments if i at least get one do

ne ill be so proud PLEASE HELP!!
History
2 answers:
pogonyaev3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Oral tradition

Explanation:

Oral tradition can possibly be better than written history, as it can reflect the culture of their people and it can tell you how effectively stories are kept within cultures.

vagabundo [1.1K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: Oral Traditions

Explanation: Oral traditions are traditions by people (mainly tribes) that are said out loud to connect families and continue legacies and folklore.

You might be interested in
What is the correct answer to this?​
liq [111]
True! Hope this helped! You can look it up and it will show that the Emancipation Proclamation is that when Abraham Lincoln set slaves free and the slaves when Northern or Western states! Have a good day!
8 0
3 years ago
The Constitution gives the federal goverment many important duties: making laws, raising money and deciding how to
Mama L [17]

Answer:

National defense is the priority job of the national government.

National defense is the only mandatory function of the national government. Most of the powers granted to Congress are permissive in nature. Congress is given certain authorities but not required by the Constitution to exercise them. For example, Article One, Section Eight gives Congress power to pass a bankruptcy code, but Congress actually did not enact bankruptcy laws until well into the 19th century.

But the Constitution does require the federal government to protect the nation. Article Four, Section Four states that the “United States shall guarantee to every State a republican form of government and shall protect each of them against invasion.” In other words, even if the federal government chose to exercise no other power, it must, under the Constitution, provide for the common defense.

National defense is exclusively the function of the national government. Under our Constitution, the states are generally sovereign, which means that the legitimate functions of government not specifically granted to the federal government are reserved to the states. But Article One, Section 10 does specifically prohibit the states, except with the consent of Congress, from keeping troops or warships in time of peace or engaging in war, the only exception being that states may act on their own if actually invaded. (This was necessary because, when the Constitution was written, primitive forms of communication and transportation meant that it could take weeks before Washington was even notified of an invasion.)

The great irony of our time is that the bigger the federal government has become, the less well it has performed its priority function of providing for the national defense. For example, Congress spent $787 billion in the “stimulus” bill last year, yet not a dime of it was spent on military procurement or modernization—despite the fact that America is in greater danger today than it has been at any time since Communism was threatening Europe in the late 1940s.

The Heritage Foundation has written extensively on the risks facing America and the state of our defenses. Here is a brief summary of the salient facts.

America has no strategy for victory in the war on terrorism—we’re not even calling it a war anymore—and the momentum has shifted to the terrorists. The outcome in Afghanistan is in doubt. If the terrorists succeed there, they can reconstitute their safe havens, plan further attacks on the United States, and threaten to gain control of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.

The Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, a bipartisan commission with the status of the 9/11 Commission, found unanimously that the terrorists would “more likely than not” develop and use a weapon of mass destruction against a Western city by 2013. The Director of National Intelligence publicly agreed with that assessment.

The international regime for controlling nuclear weapons is broken. Pakistan has a substantial and growing nuclear arsenal. Its intelligence organization has been penetrated by the Islamists. Both North Korea and Iran are steadily increasing the range, payload, and accuracy of their ballistic missiles. No one seriously believes that the Iranians will voluntarily stop their nuclear program or that the West (except perhaps the Israelis) will use force to stop them.

According to our Pacific commander, China is increasing its military strength far more quickly than our intelligence predicted. The Chinese have already acquired an arsenal of advanced fighters and missiles that threatens to deny the American Navy access to the Taiwan Strait. They are building as many as five submarines per year and have established a modern submarine base on the island of Hainan. They have announced plans to build a variety of the ships necessary to field a blue water capability.  

The American military is significantly weaker than it was at the end of the Cold War.  Most of our tankers are equally as old; they will not be replaced, if at all, until the 2030s. The Department of Defense wants to close our most modern cargo aircraft production line and will close our most sophisticated fighter line. The missile defense budget has been cut, and according to most reports, the Obama Administration will cut modernization budgets even further.

As important as it is for the federal government to restrain itself from interfering where it does not belong, it is equally important that the government perform its constitutionally mandated function of providing for the national defense.

America’s global influence is being checked and rolled back, and even the homeland is no longer safe from attack.

The situation can still be recovered, but only if our leaders understand their duty, regain their confidence, and reenergize the defense of freedom here and abroad.

7 0
3 years ago
Which statement about representation in the media is true?
KengaRu [80]

Answer:

C seems the most logical

8 0
3 years ago
He welded the new Red Army into a disciplined fighting force?
Fynjy0 [20]
It was "Trotsky" who welded the new Red Army into a disciplined fighting force, although his efforts would prove ultimately to be in vane since he was later persecuted for being a traitor to the state.
8 0
4 years ago
who believed the best economic system was one in which businesses compete to gain profit with minnimal or no goverment control?
xxMikexx [17]

Answer:   Adam Smith

Scottish philosopher Adam Smith (1723-1790) was strongly critical of the economic system that prevailed in his era.  Smith criticized what he called the "mercantile system" because it restricted trade and thus restricted economic growth.  The mercantile system believed the wealth of the world was a fixed amount, measured primarily in gold and silver accumulated.  The system promoted a nation selling its products abroad but not needing to buy from others, or imposing heavy tariffs if importing anything.  Colonies were created to provide raw materials and resources to the mother country and a market for the mother country's products.  Commerce was heavily controlled by the government through charters granted to specific trading companies.

Adam Smith countered by advocating a free market -- the opportunity individual businessmen and for all nations to increase their wealth by exchanging goods freely with one another according to what would become known as capitalist principles.  We also speak of <em>"laissez-faire"</em> ("let go") as a term for this sort of free-market economy, set free from government controls.  This term came from a French group of thinkers called the Physiocrats (meaning "rule by nature') who were working during the same 18th century era as Smith. The Physiocrats and Smith were in agreement about getting government out of the business of controlling business.

3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How the silica content of molten molten material affects the color of igneous rocks
    15·1 answer
  • One of Roosevelt's programs was the NBA, the National Basketball Association.
    5·2 answers
  • How were the growth of Christianity and Islam similar during the post classical era
    9·1 answer
  • What were Mexican citizens who lived in New Mexico called
    10·1 answer
  • Who was elenor of aquataine
    11·2 answers
  • What was the role of fashion in ancient greece
    13·1 answer
  • Government programs in which money is taken from one group and given to another are called
    6·2 answers
  • Abraham Lincoln was born rich<br> A. rich<br> B. poor<br> C. middle income<br> D. with five arms
    14·2 answers
  • Pls help me with this question
    5·1 answer
  • What empire was Timbuktu a part of? A. Mongol Empire B. Xiongnu Empire C. Ottoman Empire D. Mali Empire​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!