The answer is: A.) He was more lenient and was guided by Confucian ideals.
- Unlike the government methods used by Qin, which included harsh punishment for those who disagreed with him to the extent to which an individual could be put to death simply by suggesting another way to do things, the methods used by Liu Bang included the <u>abolition of the harsh law of the Qin Dynasty</u> and establishing a new one that was supported by the people. Liu took a series of measures that were <u>good for his people</u> as well, such as the reduction of field taxes levied on the peasants.
- Another difference is that, while Qin was a legalist (basically someone who believes that people are bad so it is necessary to control every minute of their lives), Liu Bang promoted Confucianism as the dominant political ideology, in which it is believed that a good government should rule by virtue and moral example rather than by punishment or force.
Regarding the other options:
- Option B.) He banned books and executed scholars who protested: Qin, and not Liu Bang, banned Confucianism along with all other schools that were against his own ideals. Freedom of speech was banned, and Quin ordered the burning of the books that critized him along with people that did so.
- C.) He divided up the power among several states: Qin, and once again not Bang, divided his empire into 36 provinces. Each had two government officials in charge of it. He implemented this measure so that he could control every citizen.
- D.) He banned all trade with cultures outside of China: China's natural barriers in the east, south, and west, protected her from invasion. But Qin wanted to reinforce China's protection from the Mongol tribe to the north. Therefore, Qin ordered his people to build The Great Wall, so the people couldn't trade with foreign cultures either.
<u>Impact of post civil war innovation compared and contrasted to pre-civil war market revolution:</u>
Post - civil war, 1916, as a section of innovation, the machines replaced hand labor by producing, increasing the commercial production enormously.
The new product was developed by the inventors required by the people and therefore the businesses increased in massive quantities. Transportation improved to a good extent by connecting nationwide network for product distribution and business operations.
On the contrast, the Market Revolution between 1793-1909 within the U.S. was a forceful modification within the manual-labor system originating within the South (and shortly moving to the North) and later spreading to the whole world.
Ancient commerce was created obsolete by enhancements in transportation, communication, and trade. The dramatic changes in labor and production at this point enclosed a good increase in wage labor. The agricultural explosion within the West and south and also the textile boom within the North reinforced the economy in supportive ways.
It is a false statement that the council of Constantinople 381 declared Jesus fully human, rather, the Trinitarian doctrine was declared.
<h3>What happened at the Council of Constantinople 381?</h3>
In the Council of Constantinople, they declared the Trinitarian doctrine of the equality of the Holy Spirit with the Father and Son.
Hence, it is a false statement that the council of Constantinople 381 declared Jesus fully human, rather, the Trinitarian doctrine was declared.
Read more about Constantinople
<em>brainly.com/question/24737666</em>
#SPJ1
Answer:
B
Explanation:
American Indians suffered staggering losses from European diseases.
To help developing nations improve health care,
