HELP MEEE! I NEED IT RIGHT NOW!
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
There is enough evidence to say that the true average heat output of persons with the syndrmoe differs from the true average heat output of non-sufferers.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have to perform a hypothesis test on the difference between means.
The null and alternative hypothesis are:
μ1: mean heat output for subjects with the syndrome.
μ2: mean heat output for non-sufferers.
We will use a significance level of 0.05.
The difference between sample means is:
The standard error is
The t-statistic is
The degrees of freedom are
The critical value for a left tailed test at a significance level of 0.05 and 16 degrees of freedom is t=-1.746.
The t-statistic is below the critical value, so it lies in the rejection region.
The null hypothesis is rejected.
There is enough evidence to say that the true average heat output of persons with the syndrmoe differs from the true average heat output of non-sufferers.
Answer:
For main effects
Factor (Language translator) confirms that there is no significance difference between two levels of language translator of main effect at 5% level of significance.
Factor (Types of language) confirms that there is no significance difference between three levels of types of language at 5% level of significance.
also,
For interaction effect between language translator and types of language, there is no significant difference that the interaction between language translator and types of language at 5% level of significance.
Step-by-step explanation:
see attached.
