For the first one, I would start by mentioning the characters crime, add something about how it was inexcusable, then incorporate a condensed precis on the characters situation (leaving out any bits that could embody the characters freedom). And end with a statement that discloses that your appeal is unarguable because (enter main argument here) and that is why so and so should be imprisoned.
<span>For the second question, I would personally choose the feminist because it would in theory be easier to explain their basic philosophy and how it is affecting the plot. Because I don't know who the character is, I can't really elaborate further. But please contact me if you need any more help, I'll do what I can. </span>
Answer:
The answer is C.) The narrator’s conflicting thoughts give this passage a fitful mood.
Explanation:
Answer:
to show that being from New York disrupts the author's relationships with the people he meets
Explanation:
According to the conversation from the excerpt of Travels with Charley, it is narrated that the speaker is treated differently by the people he met on his travels.
First, it is stated that there were interests and questions about "twenty or thirty times" during his trip and also questions from locals who asked him questions.
The purpose of the conversation is to show that being from New York disrupts the author's relationships with the people he meets
1. A friend is someone who knows all about you and still loves you.
2. The best and most beautiful things in this world cannot be seen or even heard, but must be felt with the heart.
3. A soulmate is someone that just gets you. It's a connection of minds, a mutual respect, an unconditional love and a total understanding
