Answer:
Option B - There are significant diseconomies of scope is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Option A is, not a condition that could improve the probability that the justice department would approve the merger.
The Herfindahl-Hirschman index is based on a restricted definition of the product market or the impact of foreign competition, the merger might be allowed.
It might also be permitted if one of the firms is in financial trouble, or if significant economies of scale exist in the industry.
Significant diseconomies of scope would only serve to make the merger less likely to be accepted.
Therefore, option B is the correct answer.
Answer:
total weight of debt = 0.343 or 34.3%
Explanation:
stock's market value = 17,500 x $69 = $1,207,500
bond₁'s market value = $250,000 x 101.5% = $256,750
bond₂'s market value = $350,000 x 106.5% = $372,750
total market value of the firm = $1,837,000
weighted capital structure:
market value weight
stocks $1,207,500 0.657
bond₁ $256,750 0.140
bond₂ $372,750 0.203
total $1,837,000 1
total weight of debt = 0.343 or 34.3%
Answer:
net income attributable to the non controlling interest is $40800
Explanation:
Given data
Race sold = $450000
cost = $330000
owned = 15%
net income = $204000
Race net income = $806000
to find out
net income attributable to the non controlling interest
solution
we find the non controlling interest
so we apply formula for non controlling interest that is
non controlling interest of income = net income × (100% - 80%)
put here value of net income
non controlling interest of income = net income × (20%)
non controlling interest of income = 204000 × (20%)
non controlling interest of income = 40800
so net income attributable to the non controlling interest is $40800
Answer:
The accounting cost and the economic cost associated with Joe's computer software business is $75,00 and the $165,000 respectively.
Explanation:
The computation of the accounting cost and the economic cost is shown below:
Accounting cost = Other Expenses + Salary paid to himself
= $35000 + $40,000
= $75,000
Economic cost = Accounting cost + Salary expense + Rent expenses
= $75,000 + $65,000 + $25,000
= $165,000
Answer:
the options are missing, so I looked for them:
a. The buying of government bonds leads to lower interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
b. The selling of government bonds leads to higher interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
c. The selling of government bonds leads to lower interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
d. The buying of government bonds leads to higher interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
the answer is:
b. The selling of government bonds leads to higher interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
Explanation:
The crowding out effect happens when the government increases its spending level in order to engage in an expansionary fiscal policy but someone needs to pay for this extra spending. In order for the government to finance their spending, they have to choose to either increase taxes or issue more debt. When they issue more debt, they end up decreasing private investment since money that could be used by private companies is used by the government instead.
