Total output of an economy can be divided into its alternative uses by considering who bought the output. when other countries purchase part of an economy's output, this is called Gross Domestic Product [GDP],
<h3>Gross Domestic Product</h3>
The total monetary or market worth of all the finished goods and services produced within a nation's boundaries during a certain time period is known as the gross domestic product (GDP). It serves as a thorough assessment of the state of the economy in a particular nation because it is a wide indicator of total domestic production.
Although it is often calculated on a yearly basis, GDP can also be computed on a quarterly basis. For instance, the US government estimates the annualized GDP for the entire year as well as each fiscal quarter.
To know more about 'GDP', visit :brainly.com/question/1383956
#SPJ4
Answer:
(C) Joss should charge Iris $500 and Daphne $800, that way economic surplus is maximized.
Explanation:
Assuming information asymmetries in the market, and Iris and Daphne are incapable of compare their willingness to pay against the average price of the market for this type of service, C is true since Joss maximize the economic surplus by increasing his productivity using the time better than his opportunity cost.
Answer:
Would unregulated markets produce too much or too little of Good X and Good Y, compared to the efficient output levels for these products?
Explanation:
Good X: Too Little
Good Y: Too Much
Answer:
4,700 shares
Explanation:
The computation of the number of shares of common stock outstanding at the end of the period is shown below
= Beginning shares + issued shares - repurchase shares + reissue shares
= 2,000 shares + 3,000 shares - 500 shares + 200 shares
= 4,700 shares
We applied the above equation to find out the number of shares outstanding at the end of the year
This is tough to answer in 3-5 sentences, and tends to also be a heavy identifier of your possible political leanings. You'll have to apologize if some of mine leak out in the response, but this is a question we debate hotly more frequently than every 4 years.
In general, international trade can help increase the GDP and overall profits for US-based corporations. However, if all we do is export, and we don't import, other countries don't look favorably upon that and may heavily tax our goods to counter this.
I believe we do need to be thoughtful about the amounts and kinds of international trade that we engage in. For example, farming is always a hotly debated issue for international trade, in part because farmers in other countries with a dramatically lower cost of living OR farmers in countries with a favorable currency rate (exchange from their currency to our dollars gives them an advantage) can undercut our farmers here in the US, many of whom are already struggling.
There are also those who are worried that when we import produce from countries that have not outlawed pesticides we know are carcinogenic, for instance, this creates not only a disadvantage for US farmers, but also for consumers who may be concerned about health issues.
As another example of this, many countries outlawed import of US beef during the Mad Cow Epidemic. We in turn also placed bans on importing beef from the UK.
These are examples of why it's important to be thoughtful about trade, but there are certainly many others, including decline in production jobs within the US that have left cities like Detroit a ghost town (this was formerly the hub of our automotive industry production).