Answer:
Option b (reflects..................settled) is the right response.
Explanation:
- The estimated beneficiary obligation was indeed unwounded by that of the identification of inflation rates through an investment that raises something both PBO reserve as well as the retirement expenditure between each duration.
- The premium on either the expected advantage commitment portion including its pension cost illustrates the amounts beyond which the pension contributions will indeed be reasonably negotiated.
Any other option is not connected to that case. That's the right choice.
Answer:
0.25 or 25%
Explanation:
The computation of the gross profit rate is shown below:
Gross profit rate = Gross profit ÷ Net sales revenue
where,
Net sales revenue = Sales revenue - Sales Returns and Allowances - Sales Discounts
= $2,000,000 - $250,000 - $50,000
= $1,700,000
And, the Cost of goods sold is $1,275,000
So, the gross profit is
= $1,700,000 - $1,275,000
= $425,000
So, the gross profit rate is
= $425,000 ÷ $1,700,000
= 0.25 or 25%
The economic principle of substitution says that when there are two houses in the same neighborhood with the same size, appeal, and utility, the lower-priced one will tend to sell first.
<h3>The economic principle of substitution</h3>
- According to the principle of substitution, the cost of purchasing a substitute that is just as desired tends to establish the upper limit of value, assuming no inopportune delays.
- A shrewd investor would not spend more on an asset that generates income than it would cost to construct or buy an asset of a similar nature.
- According to this theory, the cost of acquiring a comparable substitute property with the same use, design, and revenue determine the maximum value of a property in most cases.
- For instance, why would somebody pay $1,000,000 for a home when they could pay $750,000 for a different but as appealing home in the same neighborhood?
To learn more about the economic principle of substitution refer to:
brainly.com/question/9659517
#SPJ4
Answer:
The offeror may retract the offer at any time prior to acceptance.
Most likely the offeror was able to get a better deal somewhere else, which allows the offeror to retract the offer. However, if they had already made a deal, the offeror would have broken the deal, which may result in action.
~
