1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]
3 years ago
14

30 points _ brain plz answer and dont be a meany i just need the answers

History
1 answer:
scZoUnD [109]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:4.The significance of Marbury v. Madison was that it was the first U.S. Supreme Court case to apply "Judicial Review", and it allowed the Supreme Court to rule laws unconstitutional.

3.Chief Justice John Marshall 1 print : engraving. The U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review—the power of the federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. The unanimous opinion was written by Chief Justice John Marshall.

2.1803

1.The purchase doubled the size of the United States, greatly strengthened the country materially and strategically, provided a powerful impetus to westward expansion, and confirmed the doctrine of implied powers of the federal Constitution.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
I need help ASAP
Amanda [17]
That the constitution is important
8 0
3 years ago
How does the rule of law remain constant through changes and growth in society?
hodyreva [135]

Answer:Other important determinants of well-being, such as the proportion of a country that is tropical and the proportion that is urban, as well as economic freedom and the rule of law, are included in the multiple regression estimates. Thus, the sensitivity of poverty and environmental factors to population growth is examined with other factors held constant. Measures of the sensitivity of human well-being–the elasticities of these measures–in response to population growth can be calculated. Norton shows that characteristics such as a nation’s economic freedom and its legal framework are more important in determining the quality of human life and the environment than is population growth

The rule of law is defined in the Oxford English Dictionary as: "The authority and influence of law in society, especially when viewed as a constraint on individual and institutional behavior; (hence) the principle whereby all members of a society (including those in government) are considered equally subject to publicly disclosed legal codes and processes."[2] The term "rule of law" is closely related to "constitutionalism" as well as "Rechtsstaat", and refers to a political situation, not to any specific legal rule

The rule of law implies that every person is subject to the law, including people who are lawmakers, law enforcement officials, and judges.[8] In this sense, it stands in contrast to tyranny or oligarchy where the rulers are held above the law.[citation needed] Lack of the rule of law can be found in both democracies and monarchies, for example when there is neglect or ignorance of the law. The rule of law is more apt to decay if a government has insufficient corrective mechanisms for restoring it.

Explanation:

Most legal theorists believe that the rule of law has purely formal characteristics. For instance, such theorists claim that law requires generality (general rules that apply to classes of persons and behaviors as opposed to individuals), publicity (no secret laws), prospective application (little or no retroactive laws), consistency (no contradictory laws)[38], equality (applied equally throughout all society), and certainty (certainty of application for a given situation), but formalists contend that there are no requirements with regard to the content of the law. Others, including a few legal theorists, believe that the rule of law necessarily entails protection of individual rights. Within legal theory, these two approaches to the rule of law are seen as the two basic alternatives, respectively labelled the formal and substantive approaches. Still, there are other views as well. Some believe that democracy is part of the rule of law.

Fundamentally it means that there is an appropriate system through which things must be done, and all, including those who lead, must follow it. It is important, because if we do not follow the rule of law, we have chaos. Here in the US, it is the rule of law which allows us to have our Republic.

6 0
3 years ago
A political action taken by Mao Zedong was the: establishment of the People's Republic of China answering of Rhee's pleas for he
harkovskaia [24]
A political action taken by Mao Zedong was the <span>establishment of the People's Republic of China.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Define standard of living:
tatyana61 [14]

Answer: the degree of wealth and material comfort available to a person or community

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP?! ANSWER FOR BRAINLIEST :)
guajiro [1.7K]
Answer is A
The best form of government is democracy, but it depends on the people to work
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did steffens claim that philadelphians do not vote?
    13·1 answer
  • Battle of Britain
    15·1 answer
  • Mao's policies failed to bring about
    10·1 answer
  • Which person has an earth-based religion?<br> heretic<br> Muslim<br> Judaism<br> pagan
    13·1 answer
  • How did we come to the world?
    11·2 answers
  • Please help ASAP Very URGENT NEED YOUR HELP Will Mark BRAINLEST
    5·1 answer
  • During the Industrial Revolution, there were two variations of English Peppered Moths, those with light color and those with dar
    5·1 answer
  • How did wwi finally end? What werethe major outcomes of the war
    6·1 answer
  • How did Lincoln’s reaction to the wade Davis bill preserve his plan for reconstruction
    8·2 answers
  • How did a belief in the seen and unseen world help West Africans?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!