1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sidana [21]
3 years ago
11

Because the declaration of independence guarantees every american citizen the right to pursue happiness, they are free to do wha

tever makes them happy.
History
2 answers:
Fynjy0 [20]3 years ago
6 0
This statement is false. The government has the right to put limitations on there rights in certain situations<span />
Pavel [41]3 years ago
6 0
False, this sounds like a true or false answer
You might be interested in
What was the purpose of the Article of Confederation? Use your knowledge from your reading and the quote from the Articles of Co
vova2212 [387]

Answer:

B: To establish an alliance of states.

Explanation:

After the American Revolution, the Articles of Confederation was formed to establish a stable government within the United States, and in order to do so, the articles served to establish a union among the states.

3 0
2 years ago
Someone please help me out
Maksim231197 [3]
No one group would oppress another
7 0
3 years ago
Was Germany to blame for the outbreak World War I
hammer [34]

Germany is to blame for starting World War I because they were the first country to declare war before any other country. ... So overall Germany did not only start the war but they also influenced another country that was apart of their alliance (Austria-Hungary) to fight with another country (Serbia).

8 0
3 years ago
Go over your responses from parts A through D. Think of at least two different points or questions you can include in the group
Lera25 [3.4K]

Answer:

Here are some thoughts on two possible topics for the discussion:

1. “Change is welcome only when the outcomes are positive.” Change is unavoidable. But as humans, we have different ways of reacting to it depending on its outcome. If we view the outcome as positive, we are happy with the change and easily accept it. But if we view the outcome as negative or upsetting, we try to resist or deny the change. These two ways of reacting to change can be seen in both individuals and society as a whole. For example, students at a middle school might resist a change in school hours if it means having to get up earlier. But if the change means students can sleep in and arrive at school later, they might happily accept the new hours.

When a change is unavoidable and brings a negative outcome, it helps to change our outlook. Often, we focus only on the negative outcome of a change and overlook any positives. It will be easier to accept a negative change if we consider its positives. When my family had to relocate to Chicago, I resisted because it meant I would lose all my friends. But if I had focused on how I would get to live in a new place and make new friends, maybe the change would have been easier.

2. “It can be very hard to change yourself.” Who doesn’t want to change for the better? But change doesn’t happen overnight. It takes a lot of determination and hard work to bring about a change. Often, we tend to underestimate the efforts it takes to bring about a change. When we don’t see a quick change, we lose hope and give up trying altogether.  

My cousin went through something similar. He joined a gym to get stronger and healthier. But within a week, he wanted to quit. He found the workouts tough and expected to see big changes in a week. Thankfully, his trainer encouraged him to stick to his routine. And after a month, he felt much healthier and fitter.  Now he loves to get out and exercise. If my cousin had given up when he wanted to, he would have never seen the change in his health that he desired. Only by sticking to our goals can we expect to achieve a desired change.

Explanation:

This is the sample answer so make sure that you change it up a little :)

3 0
3 years ago
How would you use the word "appeasement" in a sentence, regarding to U.S. foreign policy from the years of 2000 &amp; up?
Mashcka [7]
Well appeasement means giving up principles to pacify an aggressor so basically make your sentence about one country being submissive to the other for reconciliation and neutralization
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • For any two independent events, which of the followings is correct ?
    10·1 answer
  • How does the business environment and technological innovation in the modern United States resemble the United States during the
    6·1 answer
  • what 2 dictators played a major role in WW2 and their actions taken to take control of their country and government
    7·1 answer
  • Why would Monroe decide to issue the Monroe Doctrine alone even though Britain offered to issue a joint statement?
    12·1 answer
  • How did european nationalism contribute to the outbreak of world war i?
    15·1 answer
  • What did Thaddeus Kosciusko do? What did Casimir Pulaski do?
    8·2 answers
  • How many 1/5 cup are in 5 cups
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these was a consequence of the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights
    9·2 answers
  • What impact did new farming practices and domestication of animals have during the Neolithic Revolution? allowed anthropologists
    8·1 answer
  • An increase in railroad mileage in an area led to great economic growth in that area. between 1870 and 1890, which area had the
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!