I could use some help , i really cant do geometry :(

Mathematics

2 answers:

Bond [772]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

m∠CAE = 65, m∠CBD = 65

Step-by-step explanation:

Line CA is a transversal of lines AE and BD which are parallel, in this case corresponding angles are congruent. ∠CAE and ∠CBD are corresponding angles so you can make them equal to each other. x+40=3x-10 -> 2x=50 ->x=25. Now that we have x just plug it into the equations 25+40=65 which is m∠CBD. 3(25)-10=75-10=65 is m∠CAE

Gelneren [198K]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

I am not sure but for

CAE it is 65˚

CBD it is 65˚

Step-by-step explanation:

x+40=3x-10

Move the 3x to the other side by subtracting by 3x on both sides

x-3x+40=3x-3x-10

The equation now looks like this:

-2x+40=-10

Move 40 to the other side by subtracting 40 both sides:

-2x+40-40=-10-40

-2x=-50

Divide by -2 on both sides:

-2x/-2=-50/-2

x=25

Since we found out what x is we can replace x in both CAE and CBD:

For CBD: 25+40 is 65

For CAE: 3(25)-10 is 65

You might be interested in

A company claims that the mean weight per apple they ship is 120 grams with a standard deviation of 12 grams. Data generated fro

Veronika [31]

Answer:

There is no sufficient evidence to reject the company's claim at the significance level of 0.05

Step-by-step explanation:

Let $\mu$ be the true mean weight per apple the company ship. We want to test the next hypothesis

$H_{0}:\mu=120$ vs $H_{1}:\mu\neq 120$ (two-tailed test).

Because we have a large sample of size n = 49 apples randomly selected from a shipment, the test statistic is given by

$Z=\frac{\bar{X}-120}{\sigma/\sqrt{n}}$ which is normally distributed. The observed value is

$z_{0}=\frac{122.5-120}{12/\sqrt{49}}=1.4583$ . The rejection region for $\alpha = 0.05$ is given by RR = {z| z < -1.96 or z > 1.96} where the area below -1.96 and under the standard normal density is 0.025; and the area above 1.96 and under the standard normal density is 0.025 as well. Because the observed value 1.4583 does not fall inside the rejection region RR, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.