Answer:
c. She should tell him that he should have a policy provided to all employees offering to correct any offensive conduct, and that an unreasonable failure by an employee to take advantage of corrective opportunities offered through the policy would help him avoid liability.
Explanation:
This is most likely what Kiera should tell Richard. It is true that employers are generally liable for cases of discrimination and harassment at their own place of business. This is because such cases often indicate a lack of overview and proper management. However, one way to avoid such liability would be by having a policy offered to all employees offering to correct any offensive conduct.
Answer: Using Scout's baton, Jem chops Mrs. Dubose's flowers. For his punishment, Jem has to read to Mrs.
Answer: to meet the demands of different groups to be enfranchised
Explanation:
Even though the United States was founded to be a free country, this freedom was not a reality to a lot of groups such as Black people and women, both of whom found that they could not vote in the country they called home.
The 15th and 24th Amendments aimed to remove this disenfranchisement from Black Americans by constitutionally enforcing their rights to vote and for women, the 19th Amendment took care of that. The 26th Amendment was passed to end the disenfranchisement of people within the age group of 18 - 21 who were eligible for military service but were ineligible to vote.
Answer:
Corporations were not initially held criminally responsible for corporate activities. A corporation is considered to be a legally fictitious entity, incapable of forming the means rea necessary to commit a criminal act. Initially, corporations have not been accused of corporate responsibility. A corporation is classified as legally fictional, unable to provide the means for committing a crime. In 1909, the Supreme Court rejected this proposal. A corporate who is held criminally liable for it’s employees criminal conduct may suffer financially and criminally. A corporation can be held liable for the criminal acts of it’s employees as long as the employees are acting within the scope of employment and their conduct benefits the corporation. A corporation cannot be imprisoned or punished like individuals.
Explanation:
I'm not sure if this helps but it is the best i can do