Tina and Tom are co-workers at Acme Corporation. As night custodians, they work together cleaning the Acme office building at night when the building is empty. Tom regularly makes sexual advances toward Tina that distress her. However, Tina has never complained-The statement that holds accurate is (B) <u>Acme may defend that it did not know about Tom's harassment of Tina. - it's a coworker so you need to prove the employer knew about it</u>
Explanation:
Since ,Tina and Tom are co-workers and they also work together as night custodian .If Tina has some problem with the sexual advances /behavior made tom then she should immediately complain about the same to her immediate supervisor ,But in the case above Tina has not made any complain towards the harassment act of tom .
so,the answer (B) <u>Acme may defend that it did not know about Tom's harassment of Tina. - it's a coworker so you need to prove the employer knew about it </u>holds True
Answer:
D) the supremacy of federal over state law
Explanation:
The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2), establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws.
If the Ferrets should go ahead to sign the young players they would be making a trade off between the superstar that can win the league and the 3 players.
<h3>What is a trade-off?</h3>
A trade off can be described to be the sacrifices that are made when a person decides to forego buying a good in order to purchase another good.
The team here would be foregoing having a superstar that can help them win the league for the three players that they went on to sign.
Read more on tradeoffs here:
brainly.com/question/13760478
Answer:
C
Explanation:
my teacher helped me with this quiz
