The answer is positional inequality.
it would be false information since that is only an opinion.
<span>1) RNA. This is the exact description of the RNA. A RNA is a protein derivated from the DNA, which contain a piece of information, like a protein, that need to be built. The Rna take the message to the cytoplasm, where the the protein is built. RNA is equal to DNA, with the difference that the the base U is complementary of the base A, where in the DNA, the complentary base for A is T.
2) Neither dna or rna. An enzim is a protein that act as a cathalist for many reaction. The role of dna and rna is to keep safe the genetic information and make it available on request to produce proteins and enzims, but per se they are not enzim as they do not act like catalist.</span>
Answer:
When there are conflicting decisions on the same issue by different court of appeals and when there is a rulling based on racial discrimination.
Explanation:
A writ of certiorari is simply an order a higher court such as the Supreme Court gives for them to evaluate the decisions and processes in a lower court. This enables the higher court to ascertain if there are wrongdoings in the process. Cases have been brought to the U.S Supreme Court on a regular basis through this method and they have granted only about 1.1% of over a thousand cases.
Writ of certiorari can be issued when a court of appeals in the U.S has made a decision in court which is conflicting with the decision made by another court of appeals in the same country, on the same issue. The losing party in both scenarios here can appeal to the Supreme Court.
Also, where there is an appeal court ruling that does not favor a citizen on a basis of racial discrimination with no precedent, the decision can be appealed. Similar incident happened in the case by Ricky Brown, Raishawn Morris, Charles Battiste against the City of Oneonta, New work in which it was alleged that the enforcement officials carried their tasks while targeting minority members of the area for interrogation based on race.
Answer: looking back we always project our present condition on the past. That is an unconscious process. That is why many people at certain age become nostalgic increasingly looking back at "good old days". On a different level this trace of human psychology is perfectly taken advantage of in propagada (especially in the production of historical films). Very good example of that are film of Communist era about medieval era (in such films some medieval figures are frequently depicted as "Communists", whereas some kings or popes are depicted as an example "imperialist bourgeoisie" ).
Explanation: Being 100% objective is impossible. Each individual is onesided and subjective. I do not believe we can expect more from any society. Every society and every political regime is onesided and its view on certain historical events is onesided as well. If there is a freedom of expression this imperfection can be reduced.
