In many ways, Pyrrhus is a foil to Hamlet. For example, Pyrrhus is impulsive and rash, while Hamlet is contemplative and indecisive.
What is Pyrrhus?
Pyrrhus was a Hellenistic-era Greek king and statesman. He was the Aeacid royal house's king of the Greek Molossians tribe before succeeding to the throne of Epirus. He was regarded as being one of the greatest generals in ancient times and was one of early Rome's strongest adversaries. He suffered intolerably high losses in a number of his victories, giving rise to the phrase "Pyrrhic victory." 13-year-old Pyrrhus had become king of Epirus in 306 BC, but Cassander overthrew him four years later. He participated in the Diadochi Wars before being helped by Ptolemy I Soter to retake his throne in 297 BC. In the course of what became known as the Pyrrhic War,
Additionally, Pyrrhus is vengeful and driven by a desire for revenge, while Hamlet is more concerned with justice. Finally, Pyrrhus is single-minded in his pursuit of his goals, while Hamlet is easily distracted.
To learn more about Pyrrhus
brainly.com/question/5617546
#SPJ4
Iran contra; scandal involving Reagan government illegal sales of weapons to Iran to raise money to fund rebels groups in Nicaragua.Contra is a latin american name for rebel
clinton impeachment: having an illegal affair with a white house intern known as Monica Lewinsky
bush use of executive priveleges; used executive priveleges to block congressional inquiries into FBI use of mob informant in Boston
bush criticism of the iraq war; criticised for misleading the USA that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction,and it turned out he did not.
bush patriot act; Violates the Fourth Amendment, which says the government cannot conduct a search without obtaining a warrant and showing probable cause to believe that the person has committed or will commit a crime.
Answer:
Population growth, availability of cheap, fertile land, conomic opportunity, e.g., gold (California Gold Rush), logging, farming, freedom
Explanation:
Answer:
B.) Congress is not allowed to discuss court decisions publicly.
Explanation:
The judiciary handles legal proceedings relating to passing judgment. The Supreme Court remains the lead court in the country and its cases are being presided over by federal judges. In most cases, rulings made by the Supreme court are almost final and it is deemed close. Court cases aren't to be discussed or debated on the floor of the house and atleast cannot be overturned by the legislature. Hence, this in some way ensures that there is no legislative veto which can overrule the court and the no federal judge will be dragged to the floor of the house for his ruling over a court case.
