1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Feliz [49]
3 years ago
15

According to the authors, why did newspapers seek to discredit radio as a source of news

History
1 answer:
Nesterboy [21]3 years ago
5 0
I’m sooo sorrry???? Thanks
You might be interested in
What was MOST significant about VE Day in World War II? A) Allied forces invaded France. B) It marked the end of the fighting in
Andrej [43]
B. It marked the end of fighting in Europe-- VE Day stands for "Victory in Europe" Day which was May 8, 1945.

Victory in Europe happened after an Allied Invasion of France and land invasion into Germany. Allied forces took Berlin leading to the surrender of German troops. Victory in Europe was achieved before fighting in the Pacific which would occur in September of 1945. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which term describes the series of events in 16th century England, by which the Church of England first broke away from the auth
dangina [55]
Answer: English Reformation

a series of political events in 16th century England by which the Church of England broke away from the authority of the Pope and the Roman Catholic Church

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the neolithic era the most important era for modern human civilization?
Verdich [7]
During this era, human technology boomed.  In this era, nomads have started farming. Nomads have stopped moving from one place to another. They have started forging metal tools. They also started pastoralism. They have communities and tribe. They were able to create a system on their own.
4 0
3 years ago
What was the result of the phalanx attack followed by cavalry charge at Gaugamela?
ruslelena [56]

Answer:

The end of the Peloponnesian War did not bring the promised “…beginning of freedom for all of Greece.”[1] Instead, Sparta provoked a series of wars which rearranged the system of alliances which had helped them win the long war against Athens. A peace conference between Sparta and Thebes in 371 ended badly and the Spartans promptly marched upon Thebes with an army of nine thousand hoplites and one thousand cavalry. Opposing them were six thousand Theban and allied hoplites and one thousand cavalry.[2]

Over generations, the Thebans had been increasing the depth of their phalanx, generally given pride of place on the right wing of coalition armies, from the traditional eight men, to sixteen, then twenty-five and even thirty-five ranks. As the Spartan and Theban armies maneuvered toward the plain of Leuctra, the brilliant Theban general Epaminondas devised a new tactic which would use the deep phalanx to destroy the myth of Spartan superiority.

Over the generations, the citizens of Thebes had developed a reputation as tough, unyielding fighters. Epaminondas had witnessed the power of the deep Theban phalanx at previous battles, and increased the depth of the phalanx to fifty ranks, but only eighty files wide. But Epaminondas’ true innovation was to position the deep Theban column not on the right, where it would have clashed with the Spartan’s weaker allies, but on the left, where it would attack the main phalanx of the Spartan “Peers” led by King Cleombrotus, arranged only twelve ranks deep. In other words, Epaminondas was concentrating his fighting power at the critical point in the evenly-spaced, less concentrated Spartan phalanx. Finally, he arranged the Theban’s allies on his right would advance “in echelon”, each poleis’ phalanx staying slightly to the rear of that to its left, so that the allied right would protect the Theban’s flank, but not initially engage with the enemy (see Leuctra map – ‘Initial Situation’). When asked why he positioned the Theban phalanx opposite the Spartan king, Epaminondas stated he would “crush…the head of the serpent”.[3]

3 0
2 years ago
Why was it significant that Japanese bombers failed to destroy several aircraft carriers in Pearl Harbor? It demonstrated that t
anygoal [31]
The three naval carriers would play and important role in other battles throughout the war.

The plan by the Japanese prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor was to perform a surprise-attack on the U.S. in which all of the U.S.'s major assets were destroyed; however, the several aircraft carriers that were not destroyed proved detrimental to the Japanese later on; their plan was based on crippling the U.S., but the U.S. was not entirely crippled.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What aspects of buying and selling of slaves does Northup single out for condemnation?
    15·1 answer
  • The Nye Committee hearings in the 1930s popularized the idea that a key factor leading the United States into World War I had be
    8·1 answer
  • World History (2018) Sem 1
    7·1 answer
  • Please HELP....Who initiated a major reform in the determination of citizenship?
    14·1 answer
  • Under whom did rome become the most powerful city in latium and the leader of the federation of latin cities (aka "the latin lea
    11·1 answer
  • Lumber Mill Inc. is a private employer with more than twenty employees. Its employment practices do not indicate a past pattern
    12·1 answer
  • Between 1901 and 1920, the United States intervened militarily numerous times in Caribbean countries: Group of answer choices in
    8·1 answer
  • How were people due to loopholes in the law still able to drink legally during Prohibition?
    13·1 answer
  • Brainlest?
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following is true
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!