Yes, you are correct. The answer to your problem is indeed 4.
First, we calculated the discounted price which would have been paid by Keith. That is the product of 85% and $36,000.
($36,000) x (85%) = $30,600
Then, after negotiating to pay 9% off the sale price, he will only need to pay 91% of the sale price. The new price would be,
($30600) x (0.91) = $27846
Thus, Keith will only need to pay $27,846.
Intersection (repeated element in the set)
A={-9,0,5}
B={0,2,5,8}
C={-9,2,5}
Ans: C, {5}
*In set B and C, element 2 was repeated but not for set A.
Answer:
This ordered pair is NOT a solution of the equation.
Step-by-step explanation:
First, it is important to note that ordered pairs consist of (x, y) so in this case
x = 15 and y = -3. And that any variable directly next to a number calls for multiplication. So, plugging in the variables the equation would look like
"-3 = 5 x 15"
To see if 5 x 15 = -3 we will multiply them. 5 x 15 actually equals 75 not -3. So we know this ordered pair is NOT the solution for the problem.
The vertex (minimum) of the quadratic ax² +bx +c is located at x=-b/(2a). This means the minimum value of f(x) will be found at x = -3/(2*1) = -1.5.
Since the vertex of the quadratic is less than 0, the maximum value of the quadratic will be found at x=2, the end of the interval farthest from the vertex.
On the given interval, ...
the absolute minimum value of f is f(-1.5) = ln(1.75) ≈ 0.559616
the absolute maximum value of f is f(2) = ln(14) ≈ 2.639057