Answer:Southern desires to expand slave territory led to this foreign policy debacle in 1854. Domestically, the document was one of several events leading to the Civil War, helping convince old Whigs and new Republicans that a Democrat-controlled "slave power" ran the country
Explanation:
Answer:
a. Slow down and allow him to pass
Explanation:
Since you are driving at the speed limit, you can not speed up to get out of his way. The other driver has more speed limit, and hence, he wants to pass you. If you slow down your speed he can pass and a possible accident could be avoided. Refusal to allow pass results, in most cases, a sense of jealous competition, which also could result in a fatal accident, or blowing to warn also could be irritating for another driver, who could take it as umbrage and will drive even faster in pursuit. A judicious decision is to slow down your car and allow him to pass.
Answer: According to the african bushman creation myth, great master and lord of life the Kaang.
Explanation:
First Kaang created the a, with long branches that extended over the entire country then at its base he dug a large hole which extended to way down the world where animals and humans used to live, then he led first man to come up from the hole and this man sat down at the hole edge and then a woman came up from hole. All people were gathered out of the hole, beneath the tree. Then all animals also climbed up from the hole.
Europe is a *multicultural* region because it has many different ethnic groups and languages.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. A judge could throw out the teen's confession unless the officer complies with the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona.
Explanation:
Miranda v. Arizona is a ruling of the United States Supreme Court from 1966. The case established the current practice whereby a suspect is required to read his or her rights (the so-called Miranda rights) without exception, which state the right to before a preliminary investigation of the suspect has begun.
That was the decision in Ernesto Miranda's trial. Miranda was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping and sexual assault of an 18-year-old girl on prima facie evidence. After two hours of questioning, Miranda signed the confession. However, he had never been informed of the possibility of meeting a legal adviser or of being silent, and that his confession could not be used against him. During the trial, Miranda's attorney, Alvin Moore, argued that confession would therefore not apply in court. Moore's objection was rejected and Miranda was sentenced to a lengthy prison sentence. The Arizona Supreme Court also upheld the ruling.
The United States Supreme Court, by a vote of 5 to 4, ruled that, due to the Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, no confession would be valid unless the suspect was informed of his rights. The Fifth Amendment states that no one can be compelled to testify against himself and the Sixth Addendum secures access to a lawyer. Ernesto Miranda's judgment was overturned, but he was later sentenced to prison for the same case, based on other evidence.
