Answer:
<u>God</u>
Explanation:
The divine right of kings is a political and religious doctrine of royal and political legitimacy. She assumes that the monarch is not subject to any earthly authority, but derives his right to power directly from the will of God. The king is therefore not subject to the will of his people, aristocracy or any other class including here (according to some views especially in Protestant countries) and the Church. According to this doctrine, since only God can judge an unjust king, the king cannot do wrong. Doctrine implies that any attempt to overthrow the king or restrain his powers is contrary to the will of God and may constitute a blasphemous act.
Answer:
The United States was untouched by the devastation of war.
Explanation:
I am going to say 1 because it started 2.5 billion years ago and is still hapinung today
Answer:
A: They were independent of one another.
Explanation:
Contrary to popular belief, the Maya were not a single people, but several peoples (ethnicities) who had the same linguistic and cultural origin, and inhabited Mesoamerica.
Answer:
C. producers work together to increase prices
Explanation:
The concept of the invisible hand in economics was introduced by the classical economist Adam Smith, who is considered the father of economic liberalism. According to Smith, men have a natural selfish tendency and will seek to satisfy their own needs through trade in goods and services. Thus a positive effect of each man's selfish and individual attitudes will be felt in the economy. When everyone seeks their benefits, the wheel of economics spins. This is what Smith calls the invisible hand.
Consumers will demand goods and services according to their needs. Business owners, seeking to increase their wealth, will provide consumers with the most desired products. Consumers are rational and tend to buy goods from those they provide at a lower price.
Thus competition is a central element by which Smith justifies the invisible hand. The act of union of producers is considered a cartel, something contrary to the mechanisms of competition and therefore does not fit the metaphor of the invisible hand.
