Answer:
y= 1/2x-3
Step-by-step explanation:
2y - x = 8
First find the slope
2y = x+8
Divide by 2
2y/2 = x/2 +8/2
y = 1/2 x +4
The slope is 1/2 ( y=mx+b where m is the slope and b is the y intercept)
When lines are parallel they have the same slope)
Using y = mx+b
y =1/2x+b
Substituting the point (4,-1) into the equation
-1 =1/2(4)+b
-1 = 2+b
-3 =b
The equation of the line is
y= 1/2x-3
Answer:
Part 1) 
Part 2) 
Part 3) m∠K=61°
Part 4) m∠L=119°
Part 5) m∠M=61°
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
In a parallelogram opposite angles and opposite sides are congruent and consecutive angles are supplementary
Part 1) Find the side MN
we know that
MN≅KL ----> by opposite sides
we have
therefore
Part 2) Find the side KN
we know that
KN≅LM ----> by opposite sides
we have
therefore
Part 3) Find the measure of angle K
we know that
m∠K+m∠N=180° ----> by consecutive interior angles
we have
m∠N=119°
substitute
m∠K+119°=180°
m∠K=180°-119°
m∠K=61°
Part 4) Find the measure of angle L
we know that
m∠L≅m∠N ----> by opposite angles
we have
m∠N=119°
therefore
m∠L=119°
Part 5) Find the measure of angle M
we know that
m∠M≅m∠K ----> by opposite angles
we have
m∠K=61°
therefore
m∠M=61°
9514 1404 393
Answer:
4a. ∠V≅∠Y
4b. TU ≅ WX
5. No; no applicable postulate
6. see below
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>4.</h3>
a. When you use the ASA postulate, you are claiming you have shown two angles and the side between them to be congruent. Here, you're given side TV and angle T are congruent to their counterparts, sides WY and angle W. The angle at the other end of segment TV is angle V. Its counterpart is the other end of segment WY from angle W. In order to use ASA, we must show ...
∠V≅∠Y
__
b. When you use the SAS postulate, you are claiming you have shown two sides and the angle between them are congruent. The angle T is between sides TV and TU. The angle congruent to that, ∠W, is between sides WY and WX. Then the missing congruence that must be shown is ...
TU ≅ WX
__
<h3>5.</h3>
The marked congruences are for two sides and a non-included angle. There is no SSA postulate for proving congruence. (In fact, there are two different possible triangles that have the given dimensions. This can be seen in the fact that the given angle is opposite the shortest of the given sides.)
"No, we cannot prove they are congruent because none of the five postulates or theorems can be used."
__
<h3>6.</h3>
The first statement/reason is always the list of "given" statements.
1. ∠A≅∠D, AC≅DC . . . . given
2. . . . . vertical angles are congruent
3. . . . . ASA postulate
4. . . . . CPCTC
Answer:
200
Step-by-step explanation:
just look up 2% of 4 is what and you will get the same answer
Answer:
The answer would be A. 3.3x
Step-by-step explanation:
3.3x can be broken down as 3.3.x
3.3 equals 9 and the 'x' is multiplied to 9.
Hence, it equals to 9x.
